The newspaper editorial claims that the autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders bacause illegal immigrants endanger the stability of the economy. However, before such a conclusion can be made, it is warranted that some of the assumptions be checked to determine its accuracy.
The argument assumes that the illegal immigrants are toxic and bad people. However, there may be circumstances that warrants for a good person to leave their countries. For instance, it may be that the living situation of illegal immigrant's country is awful and he/she is seeking for a greener pasture for themselve and that of their children. Having such a person in a booming country, either legally or illegally may increase the productivity of that economy. If this were the case, the assumption that illegal immigrants will wane a country's economy is unlikely to hold.
Moreover, the author assumes that the only way to strengthen a country's economy is by building borders and preventing illegal immigration. However, it is possible that the citizens of that country or even the government may be the major factor preventing the economy from stabilizing and being productive. Therefore, strengthening its borders will not be productive in this regard.
Also, the author assumes that the citizens of the country mean well for its economy and does not pose a threat to it. However, it may be that the citizens of the country are lazy and not interested in contributing to the economy. For instance, if most of the jobs in a country are done by illegal immigrants and not the citizens of that country, sending the immigrants back to their countries may threaten the economy of that country. Hence, if this assumption is true, the conclusion that sending illegal immigrants back to their countries will help the economy will not hold water.
Therefore, before a conclusion that illegal immigrants threaten an economy can be made, it is important to examine some assumptions.
- Sports stars movie stars have an obligation to behave as role models for the young people who look up to them In return for the millions of dollars that they are paid we should expect them to fulfill this societal responsibility 83
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment 62
- The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions Since they were declared a wildlife sanctuary in 2004 development along the coastal wetlands has been prohi 33
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent During the same year Omni showed a significant 66
- Sports stars movie stars have an obligation to behave as role models for the young people who look up to them In return for the millions of dollars that they are paid we should expect them to fulfill this societal responsibility 66
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...usion can be made, it is warranted that some of the assumptions be checked to determine its...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 326.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07668711656 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84686540402 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 215.323595506 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.41717791411 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 527.4 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7842920226 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413934820018 0.243740707755 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157043906517 0.0831039109588 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847155381806 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254000975953 0.150359130593 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866572592785 0.0667264976115 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...usion can be made, it is warranted that some of the assumptions be checked to determine its...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 326.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07668711656 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84686540402 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 215.323595506 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.41717791411 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 527.4 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7842920226 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413934820018 0.243740707755 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157043906517 0.0831039109588 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847155381806 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254000975953 0.150359130593 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866572592785 0.0667264976115 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.