The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your

The prompt urges that the best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things. I mostly agree with this claim and will elaborate on the necessary points to defend my position.

To begin with, the best inventions come from those who have a passion for improving things that are ordinary. For example, the invention of a car that runs on alternative fuel sources such as electricity was founded by Nicholas Tesla. In order to save our atmosphere from the dangers of carbon emission, the electric car was born. The company Tesla, which is run by Elon Musk, is one of the many companies sweeping the nation by storm. Anytime anyone drives on the road nowadays, we are bound to come across at least one alternative fuel source vehicle. This is important because without Nicholas Tesla's passion for reinventing the commonplace car, our world would be in worse shape than it is now.

In addition, aside from the invention of cars that help keep our air clean, the creation of the electric stove is another ordinary household item that has seen improvement. These stoves have improved the safety of this kitchen appliance tremendously. Children will no longer be burning their hands from touching hot burners. With today's technology, the equipment will automatically turn off the heat if a piece of metal isn't magnetized to it. This not only makes it safer for kids, but it also makes it safer from adults cooking in the kitchen and can help prevent accidents.

On the other hand, in contrast to my stance, one could argue that the best ideas come from a passionate interest in things that are out of the ordinary. Take for instance an artist that creates abstract art, the likes of which no one had ever seen before. Many artists in the past have created trends that are still trending today by thinking outside of the box. The meaning of some of these artist's abstract work is still not understood and is left unto the viewer's interpretation of what it could mean. However, not all people have the same appreciation for art as others. Thus, while these ideas could seem like the best to some, to others these ideas could seem farfetched and unimportant.

Nevertheless, although it is true that thinking outside the box could create ideas that seem like the best to some, not everyone is going to come into agreement on the importance of that idea. For the reasons that I have explained in detail, the recommendation holds true.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 421, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...y turn off the heat if a piece of metal isnt magnetized to it. This not only makes i...
^^^^
Line 7, column 460, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'viewers'' or 'viewer's'?
Suggestion: viewers'; viewer's
...ill not understood and is left unto the viewers interpretation of what it could mean. H...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, thus, while, at least, for example, for instance, in addition, in contrast, such as, in contrast to, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2027.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 421.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81472684086 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55254140811 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555819477435 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4470364227 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.5238095238 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0476190476 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2380952381 5.21951772744 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177771743206 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537655541419 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564940004037 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105433841951 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443571590313 0.0667264976115 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 421, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...y turn off the heat if a piece of metal isnt magnetized to it. This not only makes i...
^^^^
Line 7, column 460, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'viewers'' or 'viewer's'?
Suggestion: viewers'; viewer's
...ill not understood and is left unto the viewers interpretation of what it could mean. H...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, thus, while, at least, for example, for instance, in addition, in contrast, such as, in contrast to, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2027.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 421.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81472684086 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55254140811 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555819477435 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4470364227 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.5238095238 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0476190476 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2380952381 5.21951772744 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177771743206 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537655541419 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564940004037 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105433841951 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443571590313 0.0667264976115 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.