The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi

Essay topics:

The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

To gestate the younger populace of a nation for future effectiveness is not a trivial task. The prompt recommends that the best way of doing so is by imbuing a sense of cooperation rather than competition in youths. I mostly agree with this suggestion for the following 3 reasons.

First of all, for all the plaudits given to high-level competitors, an intense degree of competition is, for the most part, undesirable. The is a fine line between healthy competition, which leads to development and unhealthy competition, which harms virtually all its participants. This tenuous line is usually imperceptible to the average youth. Take for instance, the numerous cases of undegraduate elections in African Universities rife with deceit and slander. Good-willing students who run for positions often unknowingly have to engage in disreputable acts in order to remain competitive enough for success in student-led elections. The eventual elected candidate will have not only harmed his reputation, but will also spend a chunk of his elected time defending his already tainted reputation. Further, in the academia - which is highly result oriented - youths who find it difficult to compete alone will more likely resort to falsification of results to cope. This problem can develop into even far more harmful scenarios as the youths mature.To prepare young people to lead a healthy society, it needs to ensure competition does not reach this stage.

Secondly, the benefits of togetherness far outweighs singular progress. As the popular saying goes "Two heads are better than one." Cooperation leads to each participant playing a role in creating a long lasting and sustainable society.

However, the abscence of competition is also never truly desired. Mediocre work become celebrated, and errors, unquestioned. This kind of degradation of work ethic would stem from the need to cooperate, easing each others burdens, rather than compete, which leads to better results. For example, in an academic institution where cooperation is the sole focus, students are usually not invigorated to do better. When these students have to face tasking circumstances alone, they are deemed unequipped for the task. Also, when these students intermingle with pairs from a differing background, the have difficulties in coping as seen in the many academic competitions held globally. Hence, competition need not be eliminated completely for the sake of a productive generation.

In conclusion, the prompt is a highly complex issue with no easy way out. Both sides have merit, however, I mostly agree with instilling togetherness among the younger generation, as I believe, leads to a better and more productive society long term,

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-28 nha1806 view
2024-10-31 ekarumeblessing@icloud.com 79 view
2024-08-31 hainess25 70 view
2024-08-28 Rishab@1999 50 view
2024-07-02 MMoksha 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Ak_vido :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1055, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
... harmful scenarios as the youths mature.To prepare young people to lead a healthy ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2306.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 425.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42588235294 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05865201325 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602352941176 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 727.2 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.597070377 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.818181818 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3181818182 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202744854979 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052883812123 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379686167255 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101149557639 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567031149848 0.0667264976115 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 100.480337079 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.