The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Leaders are those people who can persuade others. I only partially agree with the statement that a sense of cooperation is more relevant for young people in terms of leadership than competitiveness. This question has two contradicting answers: the first is related to the personal experience of future leaders and the second is about social benefits from different kinds of leadership.
Leaders represent others in different areas of their lives. For this reason the neccessary quality of a leader is his trustworthiness. With good leadership people should feel that everything under control. However, there can often be only bad solutions and no leader can repair it. For example, the Covid-19 restrictions were extremely unpopular in many countries and spoiled the reputation for many country leaders. I think that cooperation in this situations improved the overall situation and helped to cure as many people as possible. However, the leadership became weaker - and a lot of anti-official points of view acquired more weight (e.g. antivaccine movements). Whether people want it or not, the leader often comes not from long thoughtfull duscussions but rather from chaotic competition, founded on the people's feel of security.
We should define, what is the desirable outcome for the society. Leaders, originated from cooperation, are preferrable - they probably can listen to each other better and do not tend to make bad decisions in the spheres outside of their scope. However, the fact that they are not always ready to produce a popular decision as rapidly as possible can harm their career. 'Strong leaders' - those who became a leader from competition, can be more direct in their actions and to seem more reliable for their nations.
To conclude, I think that the main question which stands before the society is not how it should prepare its leaders, but rather what leaders it needs. If the society wants leaders with strong competences and the ability to the dialogue, it should instill in youngsters a sense of cooperation. However, more often the society wants to have a trustworthy leader who can decide for them in every situation. For this goal people should have more energetic and competitive leaders.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-28 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-02 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-30 | AkellaSrinivas | 66 | view |
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well being of the societies and environments in which they operate Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations provided they operate within the law is to make as mu 50
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 70
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer 83
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 445, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ry leaders. I think that cooperation in this situations improved the overall situati...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, e.g., first, however, if, second, so, still, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1861.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 357.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21288515406 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84536524809 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543417366947 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0730139657 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9473684211 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7894736842 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.68421052632 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180764114341 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603836165856 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470206503072 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120588777652 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486011383631 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.