The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The world is divided in countires and within those counties people of different thoughts live. In perfoming their tasks, some of them prefer competition and other prefer coordination. The advantage of the task can be for whole nation or whole entity. But, cooperation should be prioritized over competition within national boundaries.
Cooperation in any task allows to give major importance to task itself. It can be seen by taking an example of football team. In the field, when players play football, cooperation plays a vital role as they play by prioritizing the task of winning of whole team and not to how much goals a player made himself. This example can be generalized to any tasks in the world, where cooperation will be promoted the success of task will be on higher priority, not the appreciation of individual's work. Furthermore, this also helps in encouraging others to be cooperative. For example, when we see ants moving in cooperation with each other for collecting food for themselves, firstly, they give importance to their task and secondly, they can be encouraging for human beings to follow their model in order to be successful in tasks.
Cooperation helps to divide the work within people instead of overwhelming oneself to be responsible for whole task. It can be justified by people working in software house where there is projectized organization strucutre. A team of people is set up to work on one project and a project manager helps in their coordination. The people in team are divided on basis of their expertise, i.e. some working on that project as front end developers and other as backend developers and hence the work is divided into two cooperating categories. This idea can be generalized to leadership, if the leader know how to cooperate he can easily divide his/her team into cooperating entities.
Cooperation promotes the friendly environment. Undoubtedly, when people start working for a single cause they don't see each other as competitors. When there is competition, a chaotic environment is inherent at that place. For example, considering the example of cricket match where teams belonging to two different contries participate. There is totally chaotic environment of supporters even seen on social media. This idea applies to any task where there is competition, the criticism on opponent becomes inherent.
The cooperative environment should be restricted within a team's own boundaries. Considering the example of a governments of two countries. To be considered reputed on international level, a country should compete with other countries. This can be done by export business, one country might need to compete with neighboring countries for exports to other nations, in order to grow their revenues. In parallel, considering the internal environment of a country, its citizens should cooperate to increase country's exports, because it would help in prosperity of whole nation.
Therefore, it can be seen that the coopearation is necessary, when all the people of an entity get equal advantage. On the other side, if whole entity will be advantageous from tasks, competition should be proritized with other entites.
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 50
- Countries should not isolate themselves from the world but instead engage other countries. 60
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns 50
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 51
- Teachers should encourage their students to question everything. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 32, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'giving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: giving
...daries. Cooperation in any task allows to give major importance to task itself. It can...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 277, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...of winning of whole team and not to how much goals a player made himself. This examp...
^^^^
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e start working for a single cause they dont see each other as competitors. When the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a team' or simply 'teams'?
Suggestion: a team; teams
...environment should be restricted within a teams own boundaries. Considering the example...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a government' or simply 'governments'?
Suggestion: a government; governments
... boundaries. Considering the example of a governments of two countries. To be considered repu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2668.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 509.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2416502947 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05352176976 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469548133595 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 836.1 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.7144240441 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2857142857 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1785714286 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.39285714286 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0984944475149 0.243740707755 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0311553894985 0.0831039109588 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309239409967 0.0758088955206 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0610468171335 0.150359130593 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015987303495 0.0667264976115 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.