"The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition."Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree

Essay topics:

"The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition."

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

Leadership is skill and trait that is highly debated upon. Can it be taught? Is it an innate character trait? A plethora of scholars and successful professionals all profess to have the single most important trait of a leader or the "Top 5 things every Leader must do". While sometimes helpful and enlightening, I believe a myriad of leadership traits can be boiled down to one single trait: cooperation. Cooperation is the essence of any team or organization: it helps to gain different perspectives, fosters working towards a common goal, and it is a trait that transcends profession. I believe that cooperation, not competition, is the driving force for successful society's leaders and future policy makers.

First, working in any team or collective is one of the baseline, habitual actions any person will do as a member of society. As humans from our primitive stone-age dwellings to today's highly sophisticated megalopolises, working in groups transcends time and culture. Whether the task is slaying a mammoth or working to broker a landmark trade agreement between two nations, cooperation has moved humans forward in multiple fields. Teaching our young people to not only be members of society, but to be its future leaders should make teaching cooperation in classrooms of paramount importance.

This fostering of cooperation is not exclusive to academics and the professional arena. Cooperation permeates most aspects of human interaction at an informal level as well. Interpersonal contact with friends, working with a spouse or partner in raising a family, and even in dealing with a quarrelsome neighbor; cooperation is used in all aspects of society. All of these examples only scratch the service on how often cooperation is used in our day to day. Fostering and instilling this sense into future leaders, will lead to a more productive and socially grounded public.

However, whenever dealing in absolutes (i.e. competition vs cooperation) much nuance is breezed over and more encompassing argument can be left to the wayside. Competition, when fostered in 'healthy' amounts, does have its merits in that it can lead to growth through necessity and desire for achievement. One must be careful in pursuing a competition based sense, while posing as a means of driving society further, it too can lead to regressive tactics that do not foster interoperability.

In conclusion, cooperation is a trait that transcends both professsions and cutlures. I believe that cooperation, not competition, is the driving force for successful society's leaders and future policy makers. When working with colleagues and even when working with others with different values and different skill sets, cooperation can foster desparate groups working towards a common goal. When fostered from a young age, both in professional and day to day interactions, can lead to not only a happier and healthier society, but also a vastly more productive one.

Votes
Average: 1.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-28 lekuleku 50 view
2020-01-20 DH123 50 view
2020-01-18 YO 50 view
2020-01-17 ali.rs 50 view
2020-01-06 Sumaiya Mila 62 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user lucasjohnbaker :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, still, well, while, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2493.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 469.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31556503198 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11227318526 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496801705757 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 771.3 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7228530102 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.391304348 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3913043478 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.95652173913 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0742148130392 0.243740707755 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0250060282928 0.0831039109588 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403297222182 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0435809673675 0.150359130593 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185901857276 0.0667264976115 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.