The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The past has shown us that the human race is often driven by its heroes' achievements and the desire of being similar to them. The prompt states that the best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of heroes or role models of people. In my opinion, I moderately agree with the statement and argue that to some extent the statement might be true for the following two reasons.
Firstly, most of the people in the world are driven by some kind of desire to be like their role model or heroes. For Instance, a person when born do not have any desire but while growing they get influenced by the things which happen beside them, if person who did not succeed in life likely have desire to be like someone who has everything he needs, perhaps can also get inspired by those people achievements, if either of the scenarios happens the overall character of society could be easily examined.
Lastly, people with stubborn behavior will not get influenced easily. For Instance, some people who have tough lives and face hardship in their life are less likely to become influenced by others as they prioritize their life and current scenarios ahead of everything. If these kinds of people are to be considered then the statement given will be hampered.
In conclusion, understanding the character of a society by examining the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models may not always be true as there is variability in this subject about the character of society stated in above points.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-03 | Zahid6400 | 66 | view |
| 2024-01-26 | LauraTing | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Isolus | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 83 | view |
- Sea otters are a small mammal that lives in the waters along North America s west coast from California to Alaska A few years ago some of the sea otter populations off of the Alaskan coast started to decline rapidly and raised several concerns because of 80
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people s efficiency so that they have more leisure time Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for t 50
- The following is a letter that recently appeared in the Oak City Gazette a local newspaper The primary function of the Committee for a Better Oak City is to advise the city government on how to make the best use of the city s limited budget However at som 60
- The following is a letter to the editor of an environmental magazine Two studies of amphibians in Xanadu National Park confirm a significant decline in the numbers of amphibians In 1975 there were seven species of amphibians in the park and there were abu 60
- The following is a letter to the editor of an environmental magazine In 1975 a wildlife census found that there were seven species of amphibians in Xanadu National Park with abundant numbers of each species However in 2002 only four species of amphibians 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... current scenarios ahead of everything. If these kinds of people are to be conside...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, may, so, then, while, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 2235.4752809 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 274.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72262773723 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52175784204 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525547445255 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 704.065955056 60% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.6751987172 60.3974514979 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.777777778 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4444444444 23.4991977007 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4444444444 5.21951772744 238% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277056698315 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122807403901 0.0831039109588 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159573954576 0.0758088955206 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20198722337 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170007241922 0.0667264976115 255% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 100.480337079 46% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.