Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.
Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based
Every day we come across a ton of information, which may or maynot be true. In most of the cases, it does not even matter, however, for important decision makings, it is always better to cross check the reliability of the available information. I mostly agree with the given prompt in a sense that any piece of information available can not be deemed as a fact, and should not be trusted. While there could be some exceptions in cases of highly intellectual guesses and scientific informations, mostly, a mere piece of information can not relied upon, primarily due to following two major reasons.
First of all, facts are the proven statements or prompts that have definite proof and a ground to stand. On contrary, a piece of information can be generated from any unreliable sources and could be just a false propoganda that holds no credibility. For instance, often in capital market, the insider traders try to influence the market by floating false pieces of information as a fact. Some investors fall in trap and lose their capitals by mistaking the false piece of information for a credible fact. The information can only be trusted when it is proven or made official by the authority.
Moreover, irrespective of the type of field, it is an understood norm that there must be some valid point or reasoning for anything to be presented as truth or fact. If any information is claimed to be a fact without any supporting proofs, it might instead be some malicious content intended to harm in some way. For instance, most of the politicians are well known for their escalated public addressing in which they proudly announce false information with great confidence. For public, It is usually a wise option to remain unaffected and rely only on facts when it comes to important decision making.
Admittedly, there could be a few exceptions in case of scientific inventions in which the scientific faternity can consider a information or prompt made out of highly educated guess. For example, if scientists release an information regarding an imminent possible collision of meteor in a particular region of the earth, there could be some possible reason or at least some educated probability in that. It might not be a wise option to question the information floated by the scientists instead of finding shelter somewhere safe.
To conclude, in most of the cases, information that comes without proper proof or validation should not be trusted, barring some exception where it might be wise to go along the flow of the information rather than oppose or question it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-12 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Dipesh1234 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Kamnele | 33 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | IshaanN | 50 | view |
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise Currently the nearest jazz club is 65 miles away thus 68
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine A recent study rating 300 male and female advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep the execut 58
- Toward the end of his life the Chevalier de Seingalt 1725 1798 wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure but since he met many famous people including kings and writers his memoir has become a 80
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 66
- Workers in the small town of Leeville take fewer sick days than workers in the large city of Masonton 50 miles away Moreover relative to population size the diagnosis of stress related illness is proportionally much lower in Leeville than in Masonton Acco 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 540, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'rely'
Suggestion: rely
...ly, a mere piece of information can not relied upon, primarily due to following two ma...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of information can be generated from any unreliable sources and could be just a f...
^^
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...h the scientific faternity can consider a information or prompt made out of highl...
^
Line 7, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eor in a particular region of the earth, there could be some possible reason or a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, well, while, at least, for example, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2146.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 434.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94470046083 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87701576861 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506912442396 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 684.0 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1297230501 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.235294118 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5294117647 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370361623433 0.243740707755 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135149506863 0.0831039109588 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743738177305 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226967949551 0.150359130593 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377255667315 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.