Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.
Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based
In a complex and quickly changing world, information is everywhere due to the technological revolution. Thus, dealing with a large amount of information in a current society can be challenging for people. Although some information may turn out false, I disagree with the claim that people should not trust any information because of the possibility that it might turn out false. I also disagree with the reason that the fact that people believe to be true is inaccurate.
Admittedly, there are kinds of information that turned out to be inaccurate after time passed by. Take Elizabeth Holmes, for example. Elizabeth Holmes was a young woman who founded a health corporation, Theranos at a very young age. Theranos instantly became famous for developing a revolutionary blood test technology, which turned out to be a false claim later. Holmes was accused of revealing inaccurate test results to the world.
However, there are many cases of new information in the field of technology that have given many advantages to society. Take Tesla, for example. Tesla is a vehicle corporation that released an electrical vehicle, by Elon Musk. Since electric vehicles do not necessary of any gas, or oil, they provide many advantages to the environment. At first, people did not want to purchase vehicles from Tesla, because of the fear of going wrong. However, until today, the vehicle has shown no problem, nor made any inappropriate incidents. As a result, receiving new technology regarding electrical vehicles made society thrive.
In summary, although there may be cases where people intentionally hide the truth from the world, there are many more benefits that people can be provided by receiving new technologies and information. It is crucial to focus on the bright side, not the mere disadvantages that might not even happen in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-12 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Dipesh1234 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Kamnele | 33 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | IshaanN | 50 | view |
- Claim Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate practical application Reason It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty Writ 50
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field 50
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d 50
- Claim Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system Reason Laws cannot change what is in people s hearts or minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason 50
- Claim Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future Reason Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate Write a response in which you discus 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...gh some information may turn out false, I disagree with the claim that people sho...
^
Line 1, column 381, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ssibility that it might turn out false. I also disagree with the reason that the ...
^
Line 1, column 473, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople believe to be true is inaccurate. Admittedly, there are kinds of informati...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inaccurate test results to the world. However, there are many cases of new inf...
^^
Line 3, column 622, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lectrical vehicles made society thrive. In summary, although there may be cases ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at might not even happen in the future.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, may, regarding, so, thus, for example, in summary, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 299.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16722408027 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91778371681 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56856187291 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8565328381 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8333333333 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6111111111 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286393603519 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764320095541 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870515965561 0.0758088955206 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168960644646 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0934942963847 0.0667264976115 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.