Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The society is the backbone of a nation. The prosperity and success of the society reveal the true history of the society and the people who are living in the society. For that reason, the first and foremost responsibility of the society is to create a renounable and scrupulous image in front of the whole world. A society’s most cardinal resource is the people who live in the society. They are the core representative of the society. Their social ethics and unique knowledge make them capable to present the society in front of the world. The social gesture and knowledge delineate that the capability and function of the society.
In the above issue it is claimed that the best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models. This claim is totally erroneous and it wholly circumscribed our way of thinking. A society is consisted of lots of people. Some people are well-educated, assiduous, docile and scrupulous in nature. These people can able to provide lots of success and prosperity to the society by their unique work. On the other hand, there are some people in the society who are unscrupulous, arrant, capricious and sycophant in nature and they can create some huge conundrums in the society and by this they can restrain the success of the society. However, some people are doing lots of work but can not able to achieve the light of the success but that does not mean that they are not contributing toward the success of the society.
An example can be used to explain this abstruse condition. Researchers and scientists of a nation work hard and they are playing a paramount role in the prosperity of the society. Their work is well known by the people of the whole world and thus they can able to bring success to the nation. But, the main point is only the researches and scientists are not working, there are many other people who are working sedulously and diligently to improve a research. However, the world can be able to recognize the name of only few people. They never think the potential and enthusiasm of the other people who deliberately worked hard to make this project a huge success.
Another example is used to clear the whole concept. A citizen of a society who achieve success and bring prosperity to the society can not be able to grow in a single day. Many people work hard to build up the character and mind of that citizen. Likewise, his/her parents build up her/his mind with moral values and social ethics. His/her teachers work hard to build up his mind and knowledge in a scrupulous and well-developed manner. His/her friends also contribute a lot to augment his/her enthusiasm. Consequently, many people work hard to develop the character and mind of the social heroes and without their constant support it is quite convoluted to build up the mind and nature of the social heroes.
In conclusion, it can be asserted that not only the social heroes but also many people work hard to bring prosperity and success for the society and the whole nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-03 | Zahid6400 | 66 | view |
| 2024-01-26 | LauraTing | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Isolus | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 83 | view |
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s 66
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and support 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. 3
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist."Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rat 62
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...searches and scientists are not working, there are many other people who are work...
^^
Line 3, column 450, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...ng sedulously and diligently to improve a research. However, the world can be able to reco...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, likewise, so, thus, well, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 34.0 14.8657303371 229% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2567.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 543.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72744014733 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82725184711 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63704512026 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.362799263352 0.4932671777 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 819.9 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.6468952185 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6785714286 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3928571429 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53571428571 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23384163377 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752925487443 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136526400463 0.0758088955206 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136313408136 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10366470925 0.0667264976115 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.