Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.
A role model chosen by a society is someone who represents the people over there, every time and everywhere. Every group has a representative among them, from village headman to the president of a nation. A huge population of the people under a leader looks up to him or her with a pride.
However, I strongly disagree with the claim made by the author that “ the best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models”, as I believe, author in his statement is clearly generalizing the people under that particular leader. As previously mentioned, “a huge population” but not all among them agree to the claim made, since it is not necessary for everyone to follow a single path. This is clearly seen in an election, some population vote for a group, some may vote for another, though the majority wins, still the minority here are implicitly forced to follow the chosen ones.
Moreover, a society amalgamates different kinds of people with variegated personalities, opinions and beliefs. Generalizing them with the role model selected by them leads to a restrictive thought. Limitation to the expression of the people making them laconic to every predicament is the result. What if the person today considered to be the role model be the headlines of the next day news reports? What if they are involved in any scandal? Should we start looking at the followers in a weird manner? So, how good or bad a society or the people over there can never be determined by the behaviour of a hero.
Misinterpretations can always restrict a person from interacting with another. Such repercussions are avoidable. Rather being introvert and misjudging people for every conundrum, dogging to your own personality and not being influenced by others is something that I would suggest everyone. In a school, a principle is a respected personal, in a family, father is a respected personal and is someone whom as a child we look up to but, at times you start inchoate your own beliefs and perspectives which could be contradictory to what your ideals believe. Most of the outsiders think that people around a family have same views. But when cogitates, we find different personalities with a same surrounding. For instance, the sixteen-year-old Greta Thunberg, the environmental activist was not supported by the Swedish people and her friends when she was sitting in front of the Swedish parliament protesting against the extreme climate change and to preserve the environment. We can clearly infer that people were not serious about this condition and what it could cause. Greta remained entrenched to her decision and gained publicity for the rising issue. Inferring that the Sweden people is most concerned about the environment from the eager shown by the little girl is a generalization.
Admittedly, following your ideals do not make you a bad person but interpreting that your character is reflected on the ideal you follow is something completely absurd.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-03 | Zahid6400 | 66 | view |
| 2024-01-26 | LauraTing | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Isolus | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 83 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its rol...
^^
Line 5, column 485, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a weird manner" with adverb for "weird"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...hould we start looking at the followers in a weird manner? So, how good or bad a society or the p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...ther. Such repercussions are avoidable. Rather being introvert and misjudging people f...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by the little girl is a generalization. Admittedly, following your ideals do not...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, still, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2569.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 512.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.017578125 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02267785596 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5234375 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 823.5 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.1781102708 60.3974514979 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.041666667 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.58333333333 5.21951772744 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183020240328 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433299599046 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102416935243 0.0758088955206 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106938108275 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.099675623078 0.0667264976115 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.