Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Olden times are worthy of mention while discussing about privacy. It was a time where obtaining information regarding something or somebody would take a long time. Due to the advancement of media and journalists, knowing about anything whatsoever has become a piece of cake. In these times, the most tiring job of a public figure is hiding their private lives from falling into the hands of the public. Saying this, I’d like to agree with the claim mentioned.
In the past, the only information we could get about public figures was what they wanted to show the society. There was a great gap between the public and the private lives of these people. All the good deeds shown would encourage everyone to consider the person magnanimous. No one would ever know about their real ways of life. But in present time, technology has advanced so much that we can hide a camera or a microphone so well and get access to so much information. It has become so easy to know everything from when a person wakes up to what they eat and when they go to sleep. All this knowledge shows the true nature of a person and hence, becoming a hero in the society would need a flawless character.
As there is easy access to copious amounts of information, the word has become very competitive. Achievements have lost their value and judgments have increased. People’s achievements are scrutinized by the media to an extent that the achievement no longer appears to be a great thing. For example, in earlier days when there was not much access to media, villages considered a millionaire to be the most successful and where lionized by the society. But in present days, it is a common thing to come across billionaires and nobody gives much attention to that.
It is possible that the reputation of people subjected to media scrutiny may not diminish. If the person is so flawless in all aspects of their lives, any information of that person would not show them in a negative shade. Even in such cases, they could be scrutinized and false information could be planted about the person which will eventually damage their reputation. Therefore it has become a Herculean task to protect our reputation and our private lives from falling into the hands of media.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 373, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ill eventually damage their reputation. Therefore it has become a Herculean task to prote...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1862.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 390.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77435897436 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65123245502 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528205128205 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9675561528 60.3974514979 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.6666666667 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38095238095 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147330016693 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428267550771 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560269282639 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908892276492 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573852691185 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.