Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The most important role of developing a society is taken by educational institutions. That is the place where the citizens of a society explore themselves and start setting goals to achieve success in life. Educational institutions should always be those which encourage its students to reach their desired goals. Hence, the policy mentioned should not be implemented because an educational institution cannot make decisions for their students.
Students around the world are always judged by their marks. I would like to put forward that it is not always the marks of a student that determine their success. It is their inner talents which may not be shown through scores in an examination. An educational institution should never decide the future success of a student through their examinations conducted. For example, many educational institutions expect their students to use rote learning to get good scores. A student might be very knowledgeable but cannot remember an entire textbook word by word just for the sake of getting a good score. Therefore, whether such a student will achieve success or not should not be decided based on these examinations.
Students should always be given the freedom to pursue any field of study. It is the student’s responsibility to explore themselves and know what they want and where they want to be in their future. Once they take the time to know this, they will pick their field of interest. It is not the responsibility of an educational institution to decide whether the student is fit for that field. The responsibility of the educational institution is only to analyze the student and provide them the appropriate education needed for them to achieve success. These places of study should not discourage the students in achieving their life goals. It has to be the realization of the students themselves if they are likely to achieve success in their field of interest.
It can be argued that teachers have enough experience to know whether a student would reach success. This could be true that teachers have seen ample number of students to know whether the current student might fail. But it is also the responsibility of the very teacher polish the student into a diamond from a muddy stone. A teacher doing his/her duty well also determines whether the student achieves success.
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 20
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 50
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the general manager of KNOW radio station Several factors indicate that radio station KNOW should shift its programming from rock and roll music to a continuous news format Consider for example that the number o 58
- The pie chart below shows the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, therefore, well, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1964.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 385.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1012987013 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85476406286 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45974025974 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 609.3 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.3575841774 60.3974514979 37% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.2727272727 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212546644951 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079380764143 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480689419228 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143011777815 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601553866133 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.