A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Students are the biggest asset for a nation and education is a tool to make them prepared to lead the nation in the future. There is a debate about whether students should be educated under a national curriculum until they enter college or they should be divided into different specialized curriculums from a young age. I strongly agree with the prompt for the following three reasons.
Firstly, students may have different strengths, weaknesses, and preferences and are not mature enough to understand that at a young age. A student can be considered mature by the college to decide what he wants to do and needs exposure to general subjects until they enter college. Studying under a general curriculum helps a student to explore his interests and choose the right field for him which can result in generating a professional adult who enjoys his work and can contribute his best for the betterment of the nation. For instance, there might be a student who is good at math at a young age but with time becomes uninterested in this subject, and being able to quit to find a new interest can help him to grow otherwise stuck in a field that does not excite him anymore, could have led him to depression and it would be waste of a potential for a nation.
Secondly, education is provided to arm the students with the necessary knowledge to shine in their personal and professional lives. In any profession, collaboration between people of different professions is required to do a project. If the students are not getting educated under a general curriculum for a certain time, there can be conflicts in such collaborations due to gaps between individual’s knowledge. Also, more aware and alert citizens can be created as they understand how basic things work in a nation and can speak up when something seems wrong to them. A responsible citizen must be aware of his surroundings which can be achieved by studying in a generalized education system as it provides all the basic knowledge to lead a good life. There are few subjects such as math and English which require to be learned by everyone and if it is not taught due to different curriculums to some people, they will lag in their daily life.
Moreover, equal chances are provided to each person by allowing them to study under a general curriculum for the time being. For example, if a student is not bright at a young age and gets neglected by being him into a field which might have a very low position in the society is equal to snatching the chance from him to improve. Due to this, a citizen would be deprived of his right to get a basic education. So, every student should be given equal opportunity by getting the environment to grow and flourish.
However, it can be claimed that learning a specific skill from a very young age can make a skilled generation but this system can not benefit all of the students. There can be exceptions where an extraordinary student needs to be put under a specialized curriculum to direct his intelligence to the right path. To support such talents, they can be provided with extra facilities rather than establishing a system that can hinder the potential of most of the students.
In conclusion, a nation can not shine if its students are not allowed to shine in their fields. Putting all the students under a general curriculum enables them to explore their interests and get a productive population who are capable of generating the best outcomes in their corresponding fields, and can collaborate effectively with different professionals. Special guidance can be provided to extraordinary students but general education is a basic right of people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-18 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 66
- Claim When planning courses educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students Reason Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying Write a response in which you discuss the extent 66
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 66
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...eration but this system can not benefit all of the students. There can be exceptions where...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.5258426966 184% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 28.0 12.4196629213 225% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 90.0 58.6224719101 154% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3030.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 629.0 442.535393258 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81717011129 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.00798087137 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85921903979 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426073131955 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 971.1 704.065955056 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0249660082 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.739130435 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.347826087 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47826086957 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244159573259 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08173231473 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807633181246 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154931676985 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10196810608 0.0667264976115 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...eration but this system can not benefit all of the students. There can be exceptions where...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.5258426966 184% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 28.0 12.4196629213 225% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 90.0 58.6224719101 154% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3030.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 629.0 442.535393258 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81717011129 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.00798087137 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85921903979 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426073131955 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 971.1 704.065955056 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0249660082 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.739130435 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.347826087 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47826086957 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244159573259 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08173231473 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807633181246 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154931676985 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10196810608 0.0667264976115 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.