With advancement in technologies that allows modernization, globalization and intermixing of human societies, comes one of the common dillemma of twenty first century, wheather or not modern problems of these societies can be solved by laws and legal system. The issue states that the problems cann't be solved by strong legislature referring to the inability of laws to change human nature and instincts. since the reason is based on several evidences and is strong enough to validate the statement, I agree to the reason as well as the claim.
First and foremost, people's heart and minds are the determining factors for laws, and laws are not determining factors for people's heart and minds. Most of the modern societies are based on democracy and democracy provides the right of legislature to the people. They are there with soverign right to form, ammend and delete any laws and legal systems if necessary. Most importantly, the root of these laws lies in the heart and mind of people, not in the ones who are part of legal system. The quote 'People are not there for the law, law is there for the peple' clearly fits in this scenario. This approves the given reason behind the claim.
Secondly, We have seen various revolutions around the world, changing not only legislatures, but also the system in which legislatures depend. Not only popular revolutions such as Arab Spring of 2011, lesser known events such as revolution that happened in Nepal in 2006 are part of this procedure. Ability of public to change systems this way illucidates ability of people's mind and heart to determine the way legislature goes. The claim is strengthened by this statement.
Further, we have seen that imposing stronger laws in order to change people's heart and minds can lead to grave circumstances. Recent conditions of france and Manipur state of india are among plethora of examples. Racial violence in Manipur state of India broke out when when new laws and ammendements in prevailing laws were imposed by state assembly. These laws were imposed in order to change what people of one ethnic group perceive another ethnic group. However, these laws, instead of changing their perception, lead to acerbic situation between tribes and eventually a fiasco. Similar conditions appeared in france since february 2023 when a certain law and strong legal system came face to face with its public.
One can argue that human heart and mind changes along with laws and legal systems, this process is much slower than expected. abolition of slavery in United states took decades, if not centuries to take effect. similar example can be seen regarding untouchability in Nepal. Untouchability was imposed in 1847 AD by government, it is still in practice among rural areas of nation. Strong legislature can hasten this process, but this is not without demerit of its own, as mentioned in previous paragraph.
In conclusion, it is now illuciadated that strong laws cannot change people's heart and mind and hence the problems of modern society will not be solved with strong laws and legal system. It is equally necessary to find middle grounds to find ways to solve these issues with other methods.
- A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim a 66
- The citizens of Forsythe have adopted more healthful lifestyles Their responses to a recent survey show that in their eating habits they conform more closely to government nutritional recommendations than they did ten years ago Furthermore there has been 59
- The following appeared in a memo from the owner of a chain of cheese stores located throughout the United States For many years all the stores in our chain have stocked a wide variety of both domestic and imported cheeses Last year however all of the five 70
- Claim Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system Reason Laws cannot change what is in people s hearts or minds 66
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: twenty-first
...es, comes one of the common dillemma of twenty first century, wheather or not modern problem...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
... of the common dillemma of twenty first century, wheather or not modern problems of the...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 406, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Since
...s to change human nature and instincts. since the reason is based on several evidence...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 266, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: when
...nce in Manipur state of India broke out when when new laws and ammendements in prevailing...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Abolition
...s process is much slower than expected. abolition of slavery in United states took decade...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Similar
...cades, if not centuries to take effect. similar example can be seen regarding untouchab...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, then, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2653.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 529.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01512287335 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79583152331 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64253145178 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480151228733 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 826.2 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9661035379 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.038461538 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3461538462 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.464661237546 0.243740707755 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113385878009 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112456923549 0.0758088955206 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240217489394 0.150359130593 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115575729145 0.0667264976115 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 100.480337079 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.