Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.
Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
In a quickly changing and complex world, dealing with multiple facets of research takes a pressing challenge that demands a deeper investigation. Thus, it is debatable whether to limit the range of investigation for researchers since it is impossible to predict the outcome of research. I agree with the statement that research should not be limited to exploring only immediately applicable investigations. I also agree with the reason that research has unpredictable outcomes. Although it is difficult to implement scientific applications immediately, it can still be meaningful in many fields.
First, many benefits besides an immediate application can be made by not limiting the investigation in the field of technology. For example, Tesla is a revolutionary vehicle corporation founded by Elon Musk. It produces an electrical vehicle that greatly benefits the environment by lowering gas emissions that come out of vehicles. Since the electrical vehicle was the first implementation in the world, this state-of-the-art technology needed a long time to be applied in daily life. However, since Elon Musk did not limit the area of technological development, people are now available for electronic cars that give a betterment of society.
Second, the advantages of no limitation in investigations in research can be found in the field of medicine. Take the Coronavirus vaccine, for example. During the pandemic crisis in 2019, the world needed a new vaccine to defy COVID-19. Due to the harsh situation, researchers needed to make a new vaccine as soon as possible, so the government unlimited the investigations by alleviating the intensity of the law that assesses the vaccine’s feasibility. As a result, people were able to be provided with effective vaccines such as Pfizer, and Moderna.
In summary, no limitation in scientific investigation has more benefits that prosper a nation. Even though it is difficult to predict the outcome of research, the outcome will be prestigious when it does succeed.
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d 50
- Claim In any field business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Reason The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to wh 50
- Claim Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate practical application Reason It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty Writ 50
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field 50
- Claim Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future Reason Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate Write a response in which you discus 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ble to predict the outcome of research. I agree with the statement that research ...
^
Line 1, column 408, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... immediately applicable investigations. I also agree with the reason that researc...
^
Line 2, column 154, Rule ID: THREE_NN[1]
Message: You used three nouns after one another, and this might decrease readability. You might consider rewording the sentence.
... of technology. For example, Tesla is a revolutionary vehicle corporation founded by Elon Musk. It produces an el...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, second, so, still, thus, for example, in summary, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 14.8657303371 13% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 314.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41401273885 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34770186746 2.79657885939 120% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566878980892 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1616294093 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4705882353 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262339127187 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860167084871 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873488503127 0.0758088955206 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161911114333 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0968701704352 0.0667264976115 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.