Claim: Though often considered an objective pursuit, learning about the historical past requires creativity.
Reason: Because we can never know the past directly, we must reconstruct it by imaginatively interpreting historical accounts, documents, and artifacts.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which the claim is based.
Ample amount of people are interested in history and artifacts these days, but some people say that to learn about the history, it requires great artistic and creative approach for understanding. Some believe that to recreate the scenario and understand what had happened in the past, one should have a creative approach in which they can analyze about the historical things. I partially agree with it for the following reasons.
Investigating and learning about the ancient times is not easy as it seems. Most of the times, it is extremely difficult to know where the artifact has originated from. In such scenarios, it’ll be extremely important to imagine and try to analyze where and from which era the artifact might belong to. For instance, a few days ago, archeologists found ancient utensils in the southern east part of India where they were not sure to which era it belongs to. They believed that there lived a tribe decades ago for whom these utensils might belong to. Creative and analytical thinking of archeologists helped them to identify from origination of the artifacts.
On the other hand, I personnally believe that one should have keen interest towards the field to dig deep into the history and identify the past behind it. Sometimes it can be possible that what the people believe and imagine may not be right. For instance, imagine a person finding an artifact in the jungle. With his creative thinking, he might create a story of how he strongly believes the object belongs to. However, in this scenario, he might be wrong to come to a conclusion about the artifact as he is not an experienced person in the field of acheology. This might lead to people blindly beliving in him and not cross checking the fact.
To conclude everything that I have mentioned above, creative thinking is required fro identifying the history for the archeologists but if any common man uses it, this might not be the right way to conclude about the history.
- Airline industry representatives have recently argued that flying is safer than driving citing two separate studies First U S statistics show that each year there are approximately 40 000 deaths in automobile accidents versus only approximately 200 in fli 70
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 50
- A recent study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that employees with paid sick leave are 28 less likely to be involved in a work related accident than employees who do not receive payment for sick leave Researchers hypothesize that e 60
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 50
- Claim Though often considered an objective pursuit learning about the historical past requires creativity Reason Because we can never know the past directly we must reconstruct it by imaginatively interpreting historical accounts documents and artifacts W 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: FOR_FRO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for'?
Suggestion: for
...ed above, creative thinking is required fro identifying the history for the archeol...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 335.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89552238806 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65523017291 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519402985075 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6119439413 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9375 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147220125441 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049474501082 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402348958555 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907832997275 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419778865458 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.