Claim: Though often considered an objective pursuit, learning about the historical past requires creativity.
Reason: Because we can never know the past directly, we must reconstruct it by imaginatively interpreting historical accounts, documents, and artifacts.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which the claim is based.
It is not uncommon for some people argue that the history is objective and will never change, so when learning it we don't have to use imagination. However, based on the incompleteness, we don't have a comprehensive understanding of the past, so some may argue that learning about the historical past requires creativity. From my point of view, I suppose it makes sense.
It is widely accepted that evidence from the past is objective and material, such as the bones from the ancient times. The scientists can use technology to determine where are they from and how long has they been. However, although the evidence cannot be changed over time, it may be fragmentary while history is consistent, which is hard to explain the coincidence between one and another. In this case, historians have to speculate what was like at that time based on the evidence. Moreover, as more and more ancient stuff being revealed, the conclusion they have made would probably changed.
Some people would argue that it is historians and archaeologists pursuit to figure out what's going on in the past. The imagination and speculation would misleading people. For example, many people are misguided to believe every man ought to marry more than one wife in ancient China, which turns out to be wrong. Although it is possible that false conjunction would make people confused, the science is developing consistently, so people cannot blame on the conclusion based on the insufficient evidence. As long as a conclusion is founded, although it may not be tested, it can be accepted for a period until the new evidence implementing.
The third reason of the statement is because the nature of history. As no one can tell what was exactly going on in the past, we must use imagination to guess. Nowadays, we can comprehensively learn the story in the past, because people have written down and reserved some important stuff. However, they may contradictory sometime, like in different time, places. This situation needs historian to consider what contributes to it, and whether should trust.
All in all, I think it is necessary to use imagination in reconstructing the past.
- Some people believe that our ever increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another Write a resp 66
- Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your 58
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 50
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posit 66
- Claim Though often considered an objective pursuit learning about the historical past requires creativity Reason Because we can never know the past directly we must reconstruct it by imaginatively interpreting historical accounts documents and artifacts W 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ll never change, so when learning it we dont have to use imagination. However, based...
^^^^
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...owever, based on the incompleteness, we dont have a comprehensive understanding of t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 587, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'change'
Suggestion: change
...onclusion they have made would probably changed. Some people would argue that it is ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...nd archaeologists pursuit to figure out whats going on in the past. The imagination a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'mislead'
Suggestion: mislead
.... The imagination and speculation would misleading people. For example, many people are mi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, third, while, for example, i suppose, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 359.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01949860724 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91990306497 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509749303621 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7239086655 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8421052632 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8947368421 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78947368421 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203653486167 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625420933666 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742105758964 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126095273964 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0785720217702 0.0667264976115 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.