College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field

Essay topics:

College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.

Selecting a college major is one of the vital tasks that help students to shape and direct their career paths. Opting for a relevant course is important for students to direct themselves on the right path. Not thinking properly at the time of selection, would diverge their career path in a direction where students might get bored or frustrated. Therefore, I believe the choices of the field of study in the college should be made with scrutiny and not simply thinking about the current job scenario.

One doesn't have to think a lot while selecting the subjects in the school, while in the college, on the other hand, it's vital to select the courses of one's liking. Otherwise, if the student selects the wrong course, would have to cope up with the subject's complications. In doing so, the student would not be able to score better grades and thus will result in an incompetent job. A student, for instance, has a penchant for computer science and technologies, if selects a course related to history or anything irrelevant to his likings - which has good job opportunities in the present time, would have to face difficulties in learning the subject because that subject will appear trite and boring. Moreover, the student needs to score good marks to be placed in a better job. However, the student won't be able to get good marks because of his interests.

In addition to this, the students who opt for the subjects committed to better job opportunities instead of keeping their interests aside will not be able to contribute any innovative and ingenious ideas to their field of study. For instance, if Lata Mangeshkar - a renowned Indian singer, would have chosen for studying then she wouldn't have contributed to the world with several famous songs. Because she opted for what she likes, she was able to perceive it consummately and was able to think differently than others. Henceforth, the students should decide their subjects by considering all the factors and thinking sagaciously.

To sum, according to the aforementioned points, it's cogent to select the college major according to your likings and interests rather than considering the current availability of the jobs, otherwise, it raises frustrations and feelings of incompetency in the students.

Votes
Average: 5 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-05-23 Nanggyu Park 67 view
2023-10-19 Jhon Kwame 50 view
2023-10-09 wopona8219 54 view
2023-10-05 sahil nain 62 view
2023-09-04 Winner 66 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 5, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... about the current job scenario. One doesnt have to think a lot while selecting the...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...and, its vital to select the courses of ones liking. Otherwise, if the student selec...
^^^^
Line 5, column 331, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...would have chosen for studying then she wouldnt have contributed to the world with seve...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, while, as to, for instance, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 376.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03457446809 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78449301679 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51329787234 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.3010980878 60.3974514979 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.2 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0666666667 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.21951772744 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247002642264 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869078097469 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817216291599 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146549040484 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0872308693831 0.0667264976115 131% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 5, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... about the current job scenario. One doesnt have to think a lot while selecting the...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...and, its vital to select the courses of ones liking. Otherwise, if the student selec...
^^^^
Line 5, column 331, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...would have chosen for studying then she wouldnt have contributed to the world with seve...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, while, as to, for instance, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 376.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03457446809 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78449301679 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51329787234 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.3010980878 60.3974514979 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.2 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0666666667 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.21951772744 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247002642264 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869078097469 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817216291599 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146549040484 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0872308693831 0.0667264976115 131% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.