College students should base their choice of field of study on the availability of jobs in that field

There is no doubt that if a student chooses the fields carefully, they will not unemployment in the future. Nowadays, the job competition is very fierce, neophytes have a difficult to get the job which is corresponding to the major they learned in the college. In simple term, there are more people graduate from university every year, whereas the available jobs are very limited that raise the unemployed rate in the society. Therefore, the learner should understand the future trend of field which they will involve and then select the propriety jobs.
We should knowledge that, student will have more opportunity to develop themselves if they opt a right job. First of all, they will accumulate a variety of experiments along with learning more knowledge. In other words, a potential position creates a diversity of chances to approach the new information or modern technologies. Base on it, they can build the sturdy career and become an expert in the field. Thus, choosing a right major will bring more benefits for themselves.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, whereas, no doubt, as well as, first of all, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 58.6224719101 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 2235.4752809 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 265.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85660377358 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69919228982 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57358490566 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 704.065955056 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3394986895 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 5.21951772744 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27390720512 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0971973704975 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110860662804 0.0758088955206 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165208919174 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549348083939 0.0667264976115 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.