College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field
Recent times, education has been shrinked to a medium to gain job rather than the mode of enriching the learnings and life values. Securing jobs is a tedious and important task and it is for that purpose students are focussing on their exam trying to score the highest but landing on a job has to be considered as one of the attributes of education and not the sole destination of the same. So encouraging students to decide their studies only based on the job opportunity of the concern field will be a grave error.
To understand the absurdity in the given argument, one must thoroughly comprehend the nature of human mind and how it evolves right from the birth. The atmosphere, circumstances and experience that the human mind exposed differs from one child to another and there is no means to put forth a standard framework for those. The cumulative experiences towards which each child is inclined to mould its needs, likes, dislikes, ability, skill, behaviour and even intelligence. In the same way, the career path and the interest in learning the particular fields is also influenced by the above mentioned parameters. External factors such as economic condition of the nation, willingness of parents and most important of all, the job opportunities can never find its place in deciding what a child wants to do.
What happens if a student prioritize the extrinsic conditions than his/her true self? There is a high possibility of stumbling in the middle and falling apart. Most of the students might get dwindled with this outcome because irrespective of all the inbuilt charisma, acquired talents and well trained abilities their mind is not made for this, their experience ought not want them to be what they are trying to be. At the same time, it might be erroneous to arrive at an arrant conclusion that he /she will fail. Few may excel, succeed and reach heights but at the end of the day it is the void that fills them as it is not truly what they want.
Putting aside the psychological aspects on why one should not choose their careers based on the scope, let us get into materialistic and economical approach. Consider an entrepreneur trying to find the best field to start his business in late 90’s. After extensive research he opens link of telephone booths and gains huge profit from them but as the years passed the need of telephone booth began to diminish due to the increased use of mobile phones and it became scarce to see at least one person a day in the booth. The same matches to job opportunities too. In this contemporary neoliberal capitalistic economy, nothing remains the same forever. The business we think flourishing right now with higher turn outs and job openings can reach dead bottom the other day and vice versa. But no room comes without door, by utilising the same neoliberalism offers one to find their recognition and success in any field they choose. Thus consideration of job opportunities becomes obsolete.
We cannot judge a fish by its ability to fly even though flying can get the fish near to more money. Many are not given the privilege of choosing their path only by focussing their interest and passion by completely eliminating the need to analyse the job opportunities the aftermath of their studies but it is important to put job scale to the second or third checklist after passion atleast in equivalent condition rather than making it a solo decision contributor
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-23 | Nanggyu Park | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-19 | Jhon Kwame | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | wopona8219 | 54 | view |
| 2023-10-05 | sahil nain | 62 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | Winner | 66 | view |
- Bullying is a big problem in many schools What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience You should write at least 254 words 78
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves 75
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The diagram shows the different stages in the production of woolen goods Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 15 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in deciding what a child wants to do. What happens if a student prioritize the...
^^^
Line 5, column 515, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little may'.
Suggestion: Little may
...rant conclusion that he /she will fail. Few may excel, succeed and reach heights but at...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 930, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...n and success in any field they choose. Thus consideration of job opportunities beco...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, so, third, thus, well, as to, at least, such as, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2851.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 589.0 442.535393258 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84040747029 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.92639038232 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7267948891 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 319.0 215.323595506 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541595925297 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 892.8 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.4149704593 60.3974514979 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.956521739 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6086956522 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226729591218 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583141874276 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745943298146 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125795653432 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789506049044 0.0667264976115 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 100.480337079 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.