"The desire of corporations to maximize profits creates conflict with the general welfare of the nation at large. "
First, the argument readily assumes that the desire of the corporation to increase the profits is creating conflict between the general welfare of nation . In any country to organize the welfare schemes the government uses the money from the revenue which is generated in different types of taxes. This argument seems to be baseless for various reasons.
Usually in most of the countries the taxes paid my the citizens are proportional to their incomes. Therefore a person with sufficient earning might not feel it as a encumbrance. For instance, If heavy tax is laid on oil, it indirectly affects the person who can afford vehicles which is a relatively luxury commodity which common man and rich can only afford. The taxes collected here can be used for the impoverishment of under privileged by spending it on basic amenities such as education and medical facilities. The welfare schemes not only empower the poor but also curb the rise of anti social activities in the society which is deleterious for the nation.
On the other hand increasing taxes on commonly used items irrespective of stature such as food, medicines may strongly hit a common man, who constitute a major population in developing countries. This directly or indirectly affects the economy whereby decreasing the purchasing power of people.
Taking the above mentioned arguments into consideration. In order to increase their fund the government should not take any measure which would strongly hit the common man at the same time it important for any economy not to abandon the general welfare.
Briefly this argument is weak because it depends on the oversimplified assumption that The desire of corporations to maximize profits creates conflict with the general welfare of the nation at large. To better evaluate the argument we would need more information on what the corporation is doing in order to maximize the profits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-01 | alpine.pooja@gmail.com | 70 | view |
| 2019-01-07 | Fatima Taj | 75 | view |
| 2018-11-19 | yashicasaun | 50 | view |
| 2018-05-03 | elin.vanigtm | 66 | view |
| 2016-11-28 | rvssuneeth@gmail.com | 33 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ct between the general welfare of nation . In any country to organize the welfare ...
^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...zens are proportional to their incomes. Therefore a person with sufficient earning might ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...sufficient earning might not feel it as a encumbrance. For instance, If heavy tax...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.6327345309 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 28.8173652695 49% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 55.5748502994 76% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 2260.96107784 71% => OK
No of words: 310.0 441.139720559 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16451612903 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83586703331 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 204.123752495 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567741935484 0.468620217663 121% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 705.55239521 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6602129725 57.8364921388 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.357142857 119.503703932 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 23.324526521 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.70786347227 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220115578397 0.218282227539 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788189969469 0.0743258471296 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143831635515 0.0701772020484 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134913456457 0.128457276422 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143397171765 0.0628817314937 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.3799401198 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.3550499002 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.32208582834 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 98.500998004 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.