Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed
Some people argue that it is necessary that educational institutions prevent children from choosing those fields of study in which it may be difficult for them to succeed. Although providing kids with some guidance on what may fit them best is crucial, I strongly believe that children should be personally responsible for making a choice about what to study.
First of all, it may be rather complicated to estimate children’s abilities in a particular field of study. It often happens that a child who did not possess strong skills in math in the past, suddenly becomes extremely interested in the course. This strong interest can motivate a kid to overcome all the difficulties with the subject that he or she experienced before. If educational institutions prevent this child from pursuing math studies, a child may never know about his or her abilities.
Dissuading kids from choosing a particular field of study for the reasons that there is little demand for such kind of specialists is also unreasonable. Our world is changing constantly, and those fields of study that may be considered not popular by educational institutions at the moment, may become very demanded and highly paid in a few years.
Finally, it is a common opinion that children should learn by making their own mistakes. Even if they are not going to succeed in the future in the field of study that they personally chose in the past, they will understand that this was their personal choice. They say that it is better to try and be disappointed than never try. On the other hand, if a child is persuaded by its school to choose classes that he or she is not interested in and ultimately this child will not become successful, then he or she may start to blame themselves for not following their heart. They may also start to blame their school for convincing them to choose the wrong path.
To sum up, I think that it is vital for educational institutions to inform a kid about those fields of studies where the kid will be able to take advantage of his or her greatest abilities. However, thorough examination of the issue shows that it is more important to leave the responsibility for choosing the field of study for the kids themselves. This will enable to prevent situations when children are not able to discover some hidden potential or when they follow the advice of their school that may be wrong in the end.
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting y 62
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little im 59
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 29
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the po 50
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 292, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...l choice. They say that it is better to try and be disappointed than never try. On the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, so, then, i think, kind of, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 33.0505617978 185% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 416.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80528846154 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75062925661 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46875 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6055192073 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.9375 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229325765995 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793072898055 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076961521234 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136779184817 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373931389049 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.