Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The topic raised a controversial issue whether educational institute should discourage students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. I partially agree with the statement.
Most of the educational institutions will grade the students based on their scores whether he will be able to succeed to or not. but if you look at the history, people who created wonders did not have good scores or from the prestigious universities. if you consider the maths genius ramanujan, he did not go to any universtiy to study, yet he provided a methods formulas and theorems which we are using still. NOt only ramanujan there are many people in history. I would also like to point out that most of the educational institutions are commercialized and not focussing on students interest but for money.
I would also like to point out, there are students in history who achieved wonders with the right guidance. A mentor will be needed to identify the student strong position like in the same way how we convert the stone into a diamond. mentor will do the role to convert the student into diamond.
In conclusion, although we have adavnatges and disadvantages, i could say the educational institutes should not discourage students even though they are unlikely to succeed, because you never know whats in store for them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'maths'' or 'math's'?
Suggestion: maths'; math's
...igious universities if you consider the maths genius ramanujan he did not go to any u...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... point out there are students in history who achieved wonders with the right guid...
^^
Line 7, column 61, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...gh we have adavnatges and disadvantages i could say the educational institutes sh...
^
Line 7, column 195, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...ikely to succeed because you never know whats in store for them
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, still, in conclusion, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1100.0 2235.4752809 49% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 224.0 442.535393258 51% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91071428571 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.55969084622 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75926084453 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 215.323595506 56% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 704.065955056 50% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.2370786517 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 224.0 23.0359550562 972% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 60.3974514979 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1100.0 118.986275619 924% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 224.0 23.4991977007 953% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 62.0 5.21951772744 1188% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285430523413 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.285430523413 0.0831039109588 343% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0758088955206 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194226927605 0.150359130593 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125328346282 0.0667264976115 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 113.7 14.1392134831 804% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -155.88 48.8420337079 -319% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.92365168539 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 90.7 12.1743820225 745% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.68 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 17.99 8.38706741573 214% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 46.0 100.480337079 46% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 59.0 11.8971910112 496% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 91.6 11.2143820225 817% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.