Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.
The statement plays on the notion that people should choose which laws to follow and which to ignore based on their own critical thinking and moral understanding. It assumes that people are capable of choosing which laws are beneficial to the society as a whole and which detrimental. However, I cannot agree with this statement completely.
It might be prudent to resist unjust and unethical laws in authoritarian and totalitarian governments like the Nazi Germany. Resisting and revolutions is what brought an end to the oppressive regimes of these kind of governments. Moreover, a soldier when ordered to kill inconspicuous unarmed peasants during an occupation might chose to not to obey the direct orders conflicting with his morals. In doing so he obviously spared the innocent peasants as well as spared himself the mental trauma. Hence, choosing to obey certain laws and to disobey unjust laws based on one's moral compass is wise and beneficial to all parties involved in some cases.
Nonetheless, laws based on collective good of the society which may seem unjust when considered individually need to followed. For example, compulsory face masks among shoppers and shop-keepers during the recent unsettling times of the COVID-19 pandemic are in place for the common good. People with respiratory problems and asthma might face breathing problems and thus chose to not wear the mask. In doing so, they will risk getting infected by corona virus and further add to the problems of worsening pandemic.
Furthermore, frisking and security check at airport, subway stations, malls might seem to increase your waiting times. But these security measures are in place to protect the society against violent terrorist attacks and mishaps. Thus while it may seem more beneficial individually to skip the check and proceed through your chores, when viewed through a macroscopic lens, such laws exist to maintain order in society and smooth its functioning.
Against following societal norms blindly, one might also argue that the morals and ethics of a particular society are so skewed, that the seemingly just laws are in-fact oppressive to the minorities. For example, through propaganda in Nazi Germany, the layman’s perception of jews were affected drastically. They willingly voted the nazi-party to power and paved way for the oppression and genocide of a particular minority community, while individually doing what they thought is just and ethically correct. However, such happenings are very rare throughout the history. One cannot use this as precedence for people to act how they want and take matters into their own hands rather than adhering to the normally accepted societal laws.
Thus in order for a society to function properly and justly, one needs to view through a macroscopic and collective lens when evaluating laws present in it.
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities 50
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws 75
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 58
- One can best understand the most important characteristics of a society by studying its major cities 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ght an end to the oppressive regimes of these kind of governments. Moreover, a soldier whe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 231, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... violent terrorist attacks and mishaps. Thus while it may seem more beneficial indiv...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...the normally accepted societal laws. Thus in order for a society to function prop...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, thus, well, while, for example, kind of, as well as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2414.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 456.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29385964912 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7801344266 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552631578947 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 739.8 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2373803963 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.952380952 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262463167971 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689944967732 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820533402856 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123866570302 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503505463228 0.0667264976115 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 100.480337079 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.