Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Some may believe that government officials should base their decisions on their own judgment, since the wishes and preferences of their constituents may imperil the country if actualized. However, it is more important that government officials carry out the will of the people they serve.
Firstly, by carrying out the will of the people, government officials ensure that the right of a people to self-determination is respected. If government officials ignore the will of the people and make decisions based on their own judgment, then the right of a people to decide and plan their own lives will be lost. For example, people living under a dictator who makes rules according to his/her own whim do not enjoy the right to self-determination. In short, ensuring a carrying out the will of the people is the best way for government officals to ensure that the right of a people to self-determination is not violated.
Furthermore, carrying out the will of the people ensures that government officials are less liable to make policy according to their own selfish preferences. For example, public policy polling in the United States suggests widespread support for commonsense gun-control. However, many politicians vote against such measures because they want to ensure funding for the political compaign from certain donors. As a result, guns are still too easily accessible, and gun violence remains a huge issue. By carrying out the will of the people, government officials will ensure that they make sound policy according to their constituents wishes.
Someone might object that government officials need to make decisions based on their technical know-how instead of the will of the people they serve. Government officials often possess knowledge in fields such as international relations or economics that are rarely possessed by the people the serve. So, government officials should follow their own judgemnt in making decisions rather than carry out the will of the people.
However, what this objection fails to recognize is that government officicals are often elected beacuse of their technical knowledge. The people they serve often elect government officals in order to put the knowledge they possess in these fields to use. So, by exercizing their specialized knowledge, government officials are typically carrying out the will of the people.
In conclusion, it may seem reasonable to hold that government officials should follow their own judgment rather than carry out the will of the people because they possess knowledge that the people they serve typically do not. However, government officials should ensure that they carry out the will of the people for the reasons given above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-15 | Raian Islam | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | Harsha98 | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | shiki | 66 | view |
| 2019-07-24 | Gh.Ne | 66 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | isaackoshy | 33 | view |
- "A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college."Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your positi 50
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 42
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
Some may believe that government officials should base t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, then, for example, in conclusion, in short, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2287.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 429.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.331002331 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89815686196 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.403263403263 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 691.2 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7521565564 60.3974514979 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.368421053 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5789473684 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42105263158 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334537241046 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146840175142 0.0831039109588 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922707994057 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230376506213 0.150359130593 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635351799743 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.