Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Government officials are the cogs in the figurative machine that runs a country, namely the government. They have some of he most important jobs in a country as what they do directly affects the citizens of that country. The prompt claims that rather than unquestioningly serve the will of the people, government officials should use their own judgement. While this may be a double-edged sword as what the people say should always be taken into account, I tend to mostly agree with the prompt due to the following reasons.
First of all, people's opinions and what they want in issues involving the government are many times of an impulse nature, and have the tendency to sway heavily in short periods of time. In that, the sentiment of people regarding their government and its officials at a particular time plays a heavy role in their opinion of any issue that arises at that time. For example, take the example of a government pursuing an infrastructure project. If the government were to be involved in a controversy before announcing the infrastructure project, people's approval of the government would be at a low value, this also gives political ammo to their opponents, who would further fuel the negative emotion. This sentiment would affect people's opinion of the aforementioned infrastructure project. But this emotion is ephemeral, and so it would serve the government officials that began the project ill to cancel it. In these kinds of situations, the officials have to use their own judgement and see beyond emotion and temporary opinions.
Speaking of judgement of government officials, secondly, these government officials were hired because they possessed the skillset pertaining to the job, and so are entrusted with making decisions that can affect a lot of people. For example, take the example of a crowded city in which government officials have started a metro rail project to ease congestion. While the construction is going on, people may be displeased at the further trouble caused by the construction and may ask for it to stop, but the officials that started the project would know that while the inconvenience caused may be notable, the people would be much better off in the future.
On the other hand, it is also true that absolutely not listening to what the public wants is unwise. Government officials are present to serve the people, and are obliged to listen to what the people want. Not to mention, government officials are also susceptible to corruption, so it is not always that they work keeping the best interests of the people in mind, and so their judgement might be skewed.
In conclusion, while it is true that government officials should rely on their own judgement, as they were hired because they possessed the necessary skills, it is also true that their judgement might be biased in order to favour themselves, as corruption is a widespread phenomena among government officials. The answer may not be as binary as one would think.
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve 66
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 79
- According to a recent report by our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actual 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'of the most'?
Suggestion: of the most
..., namely the government. They have some of he most important jobs in a country as what the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 273, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'phenomenon'?
Suggestion: phenomenon
...emselves, as corruption is a widespread phenomena among government officials. The answer ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in short, speaking of, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 34.0 12.9106741573 263% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2496.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 498.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01204819277 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84816547621 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455823293173 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 768.6 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.1306004956 60.3974514979 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.368421053 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2105263158 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47368421053 5.21951772744 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333924615859 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11233055287 0.0831039109588 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104307888534 0.0758088955206 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202604829847 0.150359130593 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060962702236 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.