Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development
Scientific research is a key to national and human development. If a country fails to engage in great scientific research the negative impact will be on the nation and there level of innovation will be minute. The prompt suggest that the government should not interfere or put little restriction on the scientific research. Reasoning about the demerit of putting high embargo on science exploration, I will mostly support the above prompt in two reasons.
Firstly, scientific research is the key to national development and innovation of new theories that makes the world a more better place to enjoy. For example, owing to the high cost of generating electrical energy conventionally, and the great negative impact it has on our environment, the incorporation of renewable and green energy emerge and this is a result of constant scientific research. The sun and wind energy now change the energy world but at a very high cost. Scientist doesn’t still relent until the cost of generation is getting friendly and we solve the environmental issue. If the government restrict the research ability all this that has been shaping our world wont have happened, and we wont be enjoying this innovative development.
In addition, freedom of scientific research make a way for better knowledge and understanding of our environment. A great or award winning scientist cannot be achieve without having solved a proposed a greater solution to an issues, looking at the discovery of proton, neutron and electron. Constant and non stop research makes this happened. Because it has already been established that electrons is the smallest particles , but because of continuous and non stop researches, other particles in atom were known and it leads to noble price winner then. The above illustrations shows that constant research gives us more information about our environment and this help us to move as a nation and not stagnant.
However, because of the high merit for research doesn’t mean there are no merit for restricting the research too. There are some learning that are not beneficial to us as a nation. And some research that are dangerous for our personal health and national peace. let remember those holding atomic bomb with the sole hope of using it to threatening the nation. Restricting research in this kind of area will be helpful. In conclusion if we unit and doing research that will be beneficial will help us accurately
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-09 | batterylow_123 | 66 | view |
| 2024-03-02 | LauraTing | 79 | view |
| 2024-01-29 | LauraTing | 79 | view |
| 2024-01-05 | luljaime | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-24 | Oladelejnrr | 50 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessments 58
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 62
- The nation should be responsible to design the same curiculum for att student before college 50
- Government should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
... of new theories that makes the world a more better place to enjoy. For example, owing to t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 669, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h ability all this that has been shaping our world wont have happened, and we won...
^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: award-winning
...standing of our environment. A great or award winning scientist cannot be achieve without hav...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an issue' or simply 'issues'?
Suggestion: an issue; issues
...solved a proposed a greater solution to an issues, looking at the discovery of proton, ne...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...that electrons is the smallest particles , but because of continuous and non stop ...
^^
Line 3, column 528, Rule ID: PRICE_PRIZE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'Nobel Prize' (reward)?
Suggestion: Nobel Prize
...cles in atom were known and it leads to noble price winner then. The above illustrations sh...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 577, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'show'.
Suggestion: show
...ce winner then. The above illustrations shows that constant research gives us more in...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 262, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Let
...our personal health and national peace. let remember those holding atomic bomb with...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, so, still, then, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2039.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 399.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11027568922 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89248919618 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503759398496 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.9297555462 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.95 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.95 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237358141458 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793868588414 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889519220819 0.0758088955206 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146982493272 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559295079604 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.