Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Governments have the responsibility to anticipate risks and potential dangers beforehand. Yet, dwelling too much in the future, leads to loosing focus on imminent problems. Hence I mostly agree to the prompt that governments must focus on solving immediate issues, for three reasons, which will be elucidated further.
First of all, if we solve the current problems faced by the public, eventually upcoming issues will get resolved without putting much effort. For instance, the Indian government, after its independence from Brtishers, understood caste based discrimination to be prevalent in many parts of the country. Thus, emphasized the need for reservation (a policy to help the under-privileged). This eventually helped engender equality and provided opportunities in studies, jobs and businesses for the socially , and economically backwardclass. The government that introduced the reservation system, implemented it to solve the current problem of their time, that is, oppression on the basis of caste and religion, but, in the subsequent years, the same system proved beneficial to solve social and financial problems in the country. Had the government overlooked the discrimination faced by many people, and put efforts in solving a problem that would come into existence after decades, the turmoil of that day, would not got a solution.
Secondly, what gurantees the occurrence of a problem in the future? Many instances in the world be it in the field of science, politics, or even in life, anticipating a definite future proves futile in most cases. For instance, if a government foresees an apocalypse and takes necessary precautions to survive and fight the nature, and witnesses the the day never came, it would have brought huge financial and time loss for the nation. In addition, in most of the democratically elected governments, the power is going to be changed every few years, having a long term commitment, like trying to solve a futuristic problem, can be squashed by the subsequent government, thus, wasting people’s taxes. Therefore, focusing on issues that might not even occur in the future, puts a nation to a financial loss.
Finally, if a government choses to focus on the present day problems, majority of the common issues faced by the public, witnesses solution. For example, the conjested roads of Chennai (city on South India), were responsible for the delay of office-goers and sometimes even death. To overcome the problem, the government decided to build flyovers and bridges all over the city to ease out traffic jams. Today, Chennai is the city with most number of flyovers in the Asian continent.
In conclusion, I strongly agree to the prompt that the government should focus on immediate problems, rather than a problem that would come in future, for the above stated reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-11 | guozhishan | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | sami18 | 79 | view |
| 2023-09-13 | shekhar | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | Fahim Shahriar Khan | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 50 | view |
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 50
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 66
- Send illegal immigrants to their own country 68
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them not by their contemporaries Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you ta 75
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement a 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... to loosing focus on imminent problems. Hence I mostly agree to the prompt that gover...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 500, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...es, jobs and businesses for the socially , and economically backwardclass. The gov...
^^
Line 3, column 1013, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'get'
Suggestion: get
...des, the turmoil of that day, would not got a solution. Secondly, what gurantees...
^^^
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ive and fight the nature, and witnesses the the day never came, it would have brought h...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ive and fight the nature, and witnesses the the day never came, it would have brought h...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ems, majority of the common issues faced by the public, witnesses solution. For e...
^^
Line 9, column 141, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
..., rather than a problem that would come in future, for the above stated reasons.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2386.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 450.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30222222222 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99877310815 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542222222222 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 738.9 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5440706224 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.578947368 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6842105263 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.68421052632 5.21951772744 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253169762821 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722355399889 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06205385578 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150271517996 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489465158728 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.