"Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future."
A government is a ruling body whose main motive is to solve the issues related to development of country. There are some problems that government has to deal with immediate action and some problems need long-term planning. So, with the focus on immediate problem, government should take care of anticipated future problems.
The issues like unemployment, natural calamities need immediate action. Whereas issues like poverty, adapting technology, construction of power plants need long-term planning as more money is involved for that. Since enormous money is involved to build dam, to construct power plant, it should have a vision for future application to avoid wastage of money, labor and time.
It could be seen that there is connection between problem of present and issue of tomorrow. For example, to remove unemployment, government should move towards industrialization as a immediate action. But during industrialization we have to take care of utilization of fossil fuels. If we denied it then in the near future, there is lacking of fossil fuels. Also, industrialization leads to emission of poisonous gases which leads to health problem, pollution and increasing global warming in near future. So, to avoid such types of issue, government should make a plan to solve today's problem with taking care of anticipated problems.
Also, tacking care of today's problems give benefit to ruling party. Such government gets majority support of people. Also it gives the chance of nation's development.
Thus, focusing on immediate problems, government should invest money and time to solve anticipated problems. So, duty of government is to focus on today's issue with taking an account of anticipated future issues also.
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 50
- Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 50
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field Write 50
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field Write 50
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...hould move towards industrialization as a immediate action. But during industrial...
^
Line 7, column 118, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...rnment gets majority support of people. Also it gives the chance of nations developm...
^^^^
Line 9, column 213, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...an account of anticipated future issues also.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, thus, whereas, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 33.0505617978 27% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 270.0 442.535393258 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42222222222 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98044840625 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525925925926 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8700866354 60.3974514979 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.1176470588 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8823529412 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41176470588 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377375162067 0.243740707755 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120194628468 0.0831039109588 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114520348994 0.0758088955206 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22407702116 0.150359130593 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132751629399 0.0667264976115 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.