Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Problems are quite unpredictable while in a country where too many people are living may face several kinds of acute problems. Some of them may emerge with uncertainty and some are quite predictable. And a government running a state must have the capability to deal with the issues. The prompt says that instead of working with the forthcoming solution of each individual government should concentrate on the current situation. However, it will not be a wise decision if future issues can not be controlled, thereby I strongly disagree with the statement for two reasons.
Firstly, an authority working with the problems only those that are occurring in day to day life can ease the temporary obstacles but having no preventative and corrective action plan for future is not a wise decision, rather it facilitates sometimes bigger problems which can be resisted by time decisions. Decision makers ruling a state can not choose an unpredictable path where only the present problem will be dealt with. For example, in the rainy season there is a risk of being flooded especially the coastal areas of a country. If proper actions are not taken there will be a massive disaster and the loss will be undetermined. Not only the people will suffer the consequence, the government will also suffer as the development will come to a stake. On the other hand, if the proper decision has been made by developing the forecasting site of weather and communicating timely many lives as well as belongings of individuals can be saved which in a way helps the authority for the development.In addition, this smaller action can lead to a greater development. Economy of a country can not withstand a sudden fall for an unpredictable reason.
Further, in this modern era we are living full of unpredictability. No one knows what will happen in the future. Not just waiting for luck by chance, one should have sufficient preparation to deal with it. For instance if we consider today’s COVID-19 situation in the beginning there is no precaution no plan what to do next. In case it's been too late to decide by our country leader whether to close the border to prevent the dissemination of the virus by foreigners or to give shelters to those who are fleeing from the severely affected areas. As a result due to the vast spread of this destructive virus an unmeasurable loss confronted throughout the world. Furthermore lack advancement of the research of prevention of these contagious diseases which in a way may be termed as no protection against future problems.
Of course some will argue that indulging with the future problems that have not emerged yet or sometimes can be a derivative one and all the precautions to deal with the particular will go in vain and it also hinders the development and the attention to solve the problem in regular life. In spite of this taking a small step and preparation will be easy rather than experiencing a huge disaster that can be eradicated by proper planning and execution by the rulers will of course lead to ultimate betterment.
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 58
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment and not enough time on more serious duties and obligations 83
- It s better to have above average knowledge than excellent 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 230, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put before the verb 'facilitates'.
Suggestion: sometimes facilitates
...uture is not a wise decision, rather it facilitates sometimes bigger problems which can be resisted b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1001, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...helps the authority for the development.In addition, this smaller action can lead ...
^^
Line 3, column 547, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eeing from the severely affected areas. As a result due to the vast spread of this...
^^
Line 3, column 662, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...e loss confronted throughout the world. Furthermore lack advancement of the research of pre...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of course lead to ultimate betterment.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, of course, as a result, as well as, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 27.0 12.4196629213 217% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2546.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 520.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89615384615 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91947146064 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503846153846 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 821.7 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.0013104698 60.3974514979 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.238095238 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7619047619 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61904761905 5.21951772744 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 5.13820224719 292% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127507102667 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0340070752365 0.0831039109588 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426583837428 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0838470903465 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396502934216 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.