Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
It is known that scientific research and technology development plays a crucial role at the overall development of a nation. Keeping updated and competitive into a world that is in constant evolution is extremely important. I partially agree with the given statement, since I agree that governments should place few restrictions on scientific research but I cannot agree that no restrictions should be placed by them. This is because a lot of moral and ethical issues are related to the field of research and it is necessary to establish limits that do not offend overall ethical and moral values.
I believe that the government should apply few restrictions on scientific development in order to maintain an excellent standard of ethical values. In this case few restrictions mean restrictions that preserve life and ethics. Therefore, a nation should have its own rules and legislations to limit the scope and samples of research in order to preserve animal’s lives, people’s health and wellbeing, besides maintaining ethical values. For instance, I agree that a government should forbid research developments that test their products on animals or fetuses.
Furthermore, the fact that a government just applies few restrictions can be advantageous because it limits the political interference into scientific development. For example, if an authoritarian or dictatorial politician seized power in my country, it is expected that this government would enhance the financial aid and the development of research about weapons and related war technologies. Moreover, this government probably would diminish the investments or restrict research development about communication, food improvement, health and other fields related to people’s welfare. Therefore, in this case it is important that the government has limited influence on scientific development.
On the other hand, if no restrictions are performed, it could lead to nefarious consequences. For instance, industries and companies would feel free to develop research on their products without any ethical limit. This could be very dangerous to people’s health and world safety. Besides, it can hurt a lot of moral and ethical values.
To sum up, I partially agree with the given statement since some restrictions should be placed on scientific development. At the same time, performing no restrictions could be disadvantageous and dangerous.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | Celestina Asantewaa | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 75 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-03-02 | LauraTing | 79 | view |
- Eco certified Wood Products Integrated 68
- You eat at your college cafeteria every lunchtime. However, you think it needs some improvements. Write a letter to the college magazine. In your letter:explain what you like bout the cafeteriasay what is wrongsuggest how it could be improved 78
- You rent an apartment and recently a new neighbour has moved in who lives above you. They are making a lot of noise and this is disturbing you.Write a letter to your landlord. In your letter:Explain what the problem isExplain why it is disturbing you so m 73
- A friend has agreed to look after your house and pet while you are on holiday.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter• give contact details for when you are away• give instructions about how to care for your pet• describe other household dutie 67
- Explain why you want to do the voluntary work.State what your skills and experience are.Indicate where you would like to volunteer and for how long. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2046.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 367.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57493188011 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25430500726 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476839237057 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5174765017 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.666666667 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3888888889 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252139665245 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870884305311 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729986160461 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153013292529 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518541959571 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.