Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Scientific research and development are ‘the lanes of the highway’ that takes a nation toward success and prosperity. In fact, governments are on the look of keeping the scientific research on and aiming development for their people. The prompt recommends that there should not be or be a few restrictions to be faced by organizations or people that cover scientific research and development. In my opinion, I strongly agree with this argument and argue that a government should provide enough information and get the best out of it in order to use it for the benefit of it and its own people for three reasons.
Firstly, everyone knows how fund related is keeping research up and on in order to get the results one has been waiting for. Thus, the government if it cannot provide these organizations with enough founding at least shouldn’t put restrictions on them. For example, Covid -19 time made many groups of researchers or companies work for a vaccine but at the end a few of them got approved. The expenses they had were big because Covid was unknown and it took a lot of effort and money to find a solution. In addition, development is like a young tree that should be fed to grow and not cut from the roots and not given food. Research and development are what many organizations do and we all benefit from them especially during crisis.
Secondly, even though we assume that research and development bring a lot of profits to these organizations, the government should still stay off from them because they are civil groups that are on the look for success. These groups are the beginning of thrive and fame for many scientists. For example, people who invent every year are rewarded with Nobel prices a way to honor them for the service to the world and their countries. Furthermore, Due to globalization, research develops in a country but the whole world profits from them.
Lastly, one should not forget that the governments get the fame and some economical profit that make them known in history. Therefore, the governments should balance the pros and cons and not put restrictions on scientific research and development. For instance, researchers give their time and efforts for their job. Sometimes things do not go as excepted. Some other times there is success and fame like the inventers of the electric cars or the HIV- Aids vaccine creation. Research has proven that a government that supports these people and does not put restrictions is the beginning of prosperity and development.
In conclusion, the humanity is taking many steps with the help of scientists and development that comes from them. The governments need to support and not to restrict these research and development groups in order to get the best out of them. The research profits and their effects go to the organization itself, to that country and to the whole world.
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- All parents should be required to volunteer time to their children s schools Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 50
- A society should instill to its young people the sense of cooperation and no competition 50
- Unfortunately in contemporary society creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your rea 50
- All parents should be required to volunteer to their children s schools 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 410, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...hem got approved. The expenses they had were big because Covid was unknown and it to...
^^^^
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this research' or 'these researches'?
Suggestion: this research; these researches
...nts need to support and not to restrict these research and development groups in order to get ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, lastly, look, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, at least, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 36.0 14.8657303371 242% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2384.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 489.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87525562372 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81781188461 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449897750511 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 714.6 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5924858255 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.652173913 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2608695652 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.04347826087 5.21951772744 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230179599916 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757619086372 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472555695097 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152200703535 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469177603131 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.