If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.
The statement made is justifiable in few cases but as the statement is made by an implication of “all or nothing” which can’t be fully supported. Goals differ from person to person. One can’t come to a conclusion that this is good or that is good. Each set goals according to their state of mind. But then living in a society makes it public. That is you should be aware of the things you do, it can’t be against the norms of the society. Every person is free to set goals, but what matters is your path! Which means, how you are going to achieve it defines it all.
Building up, setting a goal is an independent choice. People take different paths to get their goals fulfilled, not all paths are acceptable by the society. For example, a person has set a goal to get a good score in his semester examinations, which is noble and every student’s primary goal. Now what matters is what path u take, if the student studies for 15 hours a day and tries his best to achieve a good score in the semester then nothing like it. If the same student gets indulged into malpractices and tries to get the same score then it is surely an offensive act.
Contrastingly, one can’t come to a conclusion regarding the topic. Considering another example, the steps taken by the American government to kill Osama Bill Laden were fearful, but any step taken by the government to achieve that goal could be right as the execution of Osama was important at that point, as he was the cause for hundreds of deaths.
It depends on how necessary it is. Goals set for one’s benefit majorly are centrifuged to a point that the path chosen is not supposed to be offensive. But when it comes to the benefit of masses it can go the way best chosen by the community. The statement seems falsified when considered certain factors.
To sum up, the statement seems true at a point but is an “all or nothing” case, so one can not conclude anything on it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-19 | Juhong Park | 70 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Oladelejnrr | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | Nowshin Tabassum | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | Hitesh2411 | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | rickxiangx | 83 | view |
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. 50
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 50
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 58
- In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patro 50
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 369, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[10]
Message: The pronoun is must be used with 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...ving in a society makes it public. That is you should be aware of the things you d...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'regarding', 'so', 'then', 'for example', 'in fact', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.218823529412 0.240241500013 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.176470588235 0.157235817809 112% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0658823529412 0.0880659088768 75% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0258823529412 0.0497285424764 52% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0470588235294 0.0444667217837 106% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0847058823529 0.12292977631 69% => OK
Participles: 0.04 0.0406280797675 98% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.70952239423 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0376470588235 0.030933414821 122% => OK
Particles: 0.00470588235294 0.0016655270985 283% => OK
Determiners: 0.117647058824 0.0997080785238 118% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0188235294118 0.0249443105267 75% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0235294117647 0.0148568991511 158% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1976.0 2732.02544248 72% => OK
No of words: 355.0 452.878318584 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5661971831 6.0361032391 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.58838876751 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.267605633803 0.366273622748 73% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.222535211268 0.280924506359 79% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.154929577465 0.200843997647 77% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.112676056338 0.132149295362 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70952239423 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 219.290929204 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501408450704 0.48968727796 102% => OK
Word variations: 52.8310602402 55.4138127331 95% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.75 23.380412469 76% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.55560355 59.4972553346 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8 141.124799967 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 23.380412469 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.4 0.674092028746 59% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 40.0035211268 51.4728631049 78% => OK
Elegance: 1.37735849057 1.64882698954 84% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26666472344 0.391690518653 68% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.078322462063 0.123202303941 64% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0915982672373 0.077325440228 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.489542394169 0.547984918172 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.210754901248 0.149214159877 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101409262681 0.161403998019 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516780121286 0.0892212321368 58% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.304802766032 0.385218514788 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0518398562245 0.0692045440612 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156973593486 0.275328986314 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538987269956 0.0653680567796 82% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88274336283 184% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.