It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
I mostly agree that we could define ourselves by social groups that define the value of identity is mostly feasible, except for some nations without freedom of speech.
When people seek for identification, they have to ask for social groups for help. Because the identification comes from the speech of major people directly, not defined by awareness of oneself. For example, if major people don’t recognize the identity defined by oneself, it means one’s self-definition could be meaningless in practice. For example, years ago, in Taiwan, the whole society is loath to recognize Lesbians and gays as acceptable identities, people have never accepted the value defined by themselves until recently. However, nowadays, because the diversity of the identification has changed to liberal and promoted by the government, one type of social group, Taiwan becomes a first nation that recognizes the legality of the mono-sex marriage. Therefore, social groups absolutely equip a function of defining identification.
Furthermore, some minority groups are consolidating together and provide an impact on the society for defining new identities in society. For instance, the aboriginals in Taiwan have been marginalized a long time until recently. There are fourteen groups of native Taiwanese and live in the far away mountain in Taiwan. By the effort of these social groups, their identities have been escalating emphasized in Taiwan. There are two ways of them to promote their influence to redefine their identities, one is that they have united together and propagate the beauty of the aboriginal culture and the other key factor is a lot of flourishing singers from them. Eventually, they have gained much recognition and reputation in Taiwan.
The naysayers may argue that social groups could not help in some circumstances, like minority rights and those living below the poverty line. Of course, it is true that there are some special cases where people are not allowed to define themselves. For example, in North Korea, the dictator Kim Jong Un has the power to control people either physically or mentally. In other words, people in North Korea could define their identification or recognition by the social group. Because that nation doesn’t allow the freedom of speech which obviously a major source of defining recognition, people couldn’t speak for themselves, not to mention defining themselves.
In conclusion, few cases couldn’t accomplish their identification by an acceleration of social groups and the reasons are listed as major dominance of the speech, the power of self-definition and freedom of speech.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, except for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, of course, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2223.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 411.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40875912409 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97749584337 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506082725061 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 711.0 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1703474433 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6315789474 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57894736842 5.21951772744 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158951074611 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562143463524 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405441413802 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103118617881 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325079263299 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.