It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author assert that definition of one individual is based one how others viewing him. I agree with this opine that no matter celebrity or pedestrains are all applied to such claim.
What makes a celebrity is becuase everyone view him as a star under lamelight instead of judging by himself. The reason why Taylor Swift is known as one of the most singer is that her songs are attractive to music lovers all around world. That is to say, that the followers, the social groups defined her as the top singer. Similarly, in all other domian, no matter science, art or sports, one celebrity is called celebrity is becuase his endevaor is widely aknowledged by the rest of the world, instead if by his own statement that he is the greatest in his industry.
It follows the similar logics for the rest normal people that how people around them seeing him defined who he is. For instance, if one is a good students is by how his peers, his teachers see him. It would only be futile for him to claim that he is a good students while his teachers comment him as rambunctious. Similarly, if one fits well for certain position at work are mostly determined by his books. Therefore, one's identification in the worlds is valid only if the social group around him recognize it.
However, saying that our identification is judged by the others is not necessary saying that we should try everything we could to pleased the rest so that we could be recognized. For example, despite Van Gogh follows his own style in painting instead of meeting the preference of the people at his time. Still, he was now recognized as one of the most influentious artist in history. Therefore we should not be blindly fettered by how the rest of world would consider us.
In conclusion, who we are is primarily defined by the rest around us, but it would be overdue if all one's behavior is fully shackled in order to please the rest.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-27 | mei_unavailable | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-29 | tomlee0205 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | Jonginn | 66 | view |
| 2023-03-09 | 宋致遠 | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-07 | pavithra ramesh | 62 | view |
- The following is a letter to the editor of an environmental magazine In 1975 a wildlife census found that there were seven species of amphibians in Xanadu National Park with abundant numbers of each species However in 2002 only four species of amphibians 54
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the manager of WWAC radio station To reverse a decline in listener numbers our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock music format The decline has occurred despite population growth in o 67
- Fifteen years ago Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors Since that time Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes and overall student 66
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news During the same time period most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with th 78
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night ne ws program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complai 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'asserts'.
Suggestion: asserts
The author assert that definition of one individual is ba...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'student'?
Suggestion: student
...o he is. For instance, if one is a good students is by how his peers, his teachers see h...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 419, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...tly determined by his books. Therefore, ones identification in the worlds is valid o...
^^^^
Line 7, column 385, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...he most influentious artist in history. Therefore we should not be blindly fettered by ho...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 51, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding rest'?
Suggestion: the surrounding rest
...ion, who we are is primarily defined by the rest around us, but it would be overdue if all ones be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, similarly, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 342.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59649122807 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57555704005 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511695906433 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5115793049 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.25 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.21951772744 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0944679414102 0.243740707755 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0360745786187 0.0831039109588 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299063733201 0.0758088955206 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0558023269192 0.150359130593 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00872226904081 0.0667264976115 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 12.1639044944 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.