Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.
It is incontestable that every discovery and creations never fails to surprise mankind and has ameliorated the lifestyle of every people in the world and made living easy. Sometimes the research would bring inadvertent outcomes; while trying to solve one problem, it would solve the mystery of another one. The outline of the assertion is a contentious statement and needs scrupulous and cogent analysis as well as lucid delineation.
Admittedly, when we search for one thing, out of the blue we will get another lost thing which would be purely coincidental. New thoughts arise when we see commonplace things surrounded. For instance, Newton got the one line of his research on 'why every object is attracted to the ground', from an apple that fell on his head. Then, he started the research and found out the reason behind it.
In addition to that, when the person who found the X-Ray, was initially studying some other rays. During the process of his empirical studies, he saw a luminous ray of light in his darkroom. Enthusiastically, he started analyzing the ray and found out a novice unknown ray, which is now called the X-Ray. In spite of being founded accidentally, the use of this ray in humanity is significant and the place of this X-Ray in the medical field is irreplaceable.
Despite holding benefits, these inadvertent inventions also circumvent the planned research and deviate the scientist's mind from the original study they need to undertake. Provided that the original idea has more applications and has impending practical applications then the intended study should be carried out leaving the novice finding aside. For example, a scientist involving in the process of finding a vaccine for a deadly disease which is a pandemic and needs immediate heed, and if the researcher inadvertently finds out a chemical that would diminish other not so serious diseases, then the attention should be given in finding the vaccine instead of analyzing the activities of the chemical.
To put the enunciation in a nutshell, even though some of the discoveries are unplanned, their practical applications on the earth are indispensable. However, the cardinal purpose of experimenting is to discover or newly invent something. Even though most of the time the intended research is not successful and deviated, the discoveries never missed providing their usefulness in society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-25 | batterylow_123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | Omar Ibna Nazim | 16 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | okazaki11 | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | jayauen | 83 | view |
| 2023-02-10 | Yam Kumar Oli | 58 | view |
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 66
- Hospital statistics regarding people who go to the emergency room after roller skating accidents indicate the need for more protective equipment Within that group of people 75 percent of those who had accidents in streets or parking lots had not been wear 78
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 66
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals 66
- The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 51, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... enunciation in a nutshell, even though some of the discoveries are unplanned, their practi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, as well as, for one thing, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2008.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 387.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18863049096 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95994127114 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56330749354 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.1729928426 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.117647059 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7647058824 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41176470588 5.21951772744 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0787055977289 0.243740707755 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0245009462231 0.0831039109588 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366145091831 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0473037943153 0.150359130593 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455405422446 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.