Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Living in the heyday of technology, we are witnessing numerous discoveries and creations. Researchers and creators spend their lifetimes to come up with new discoveries or creations. This is not true that many important discoveries or creations are accidental, happened when trying to answer one question while coming across the answer to another.
While there are some instances that the researchers come across, accidentally, to a discovery, mostly, discoveries are due to a pre-planned effort. We cannot ignore that Columbus discovered America, a new continent, by accident when he was on his rout to West Indies. Or Penicillin, the earliest antibiotics, discovered by Fleming accidentally.
However, the majority of discoveries occur with a great teamwork effort and a clear goal. Researchers, normally, plan their research in advance and define a specific goal for them. Haphazardly, they could not reach an outstanding achievement. There are too many examples in history that confirm this fact. Consider the COVID pandemic as an example. During the pandemic, scientist all around the world became determined to discover the COVID vaccine. Many scientists gathered to gather and as a powerful team, put all of their energy into finding the vaccine. Without a strong teamwork, and a clear goal, they could not succeed to discover the COVID vaccine. Great discoveries would not be reached accidentally.
In the past, when technology was not advanced as today, it was more common that a discovery or creation happened by accident. There were not as many achievements as nowadays, and scientists did not have advanced tools. Therefore, it was likely that during their research, they encounter with a new discovery by chance. Nevertheless, today, with numerous advanced and technological tools, scientists have a better vision about what they are looking for and with persistent, they will achieve novel discoveries.
In conclusion, some might argue that there are examples that show that scientists find a solution or discover a new finding accidentally, but as a whole, an astonishing discovery or creation cannot be achieved without a great planning and a skillful teamwork.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-25 | batterylow_123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | Omar Ibna Nazim | 16 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | okazaki11 | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | jayauen | 83 | view |
| 2023-02-10 | Yam Kumar Oli | 58 | view |
- Collectors prize the ancient life size clay statues of human figures made on Kali Island but have long wondered how Kalinese artists were able to depict bodies with such realistic precision Since archaeologists have recently discovered molds of human head 58
- The following report appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces A study reports that in nearby East M 59
- Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don t know for example by giving clothing and food to people who need them than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support y 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 345, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cs, discovered by Fleming accidentally. However, the majority of discoveries occ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...great planning and a skillful teamwork.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 340.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42352941176 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.066511831 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538235294118 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.6156225397 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165767567325 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497958987651 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731198185022 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103740965661 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0966191080377 0.0667264976115 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.