"The most effective strategy for a company to use to maintain and increase profits over the long term is to maintain high ethical standards."

Essay topics:

"The most effective strategy for a company to use to maintain and increase profits over the long term is to maintain high ethical standards."

The author states that the most effective strategy for a company to maintain and increase its profits over the long term is to maintain high ethical standards. There are numerous ways by which a company can thrive. One of the most effective way is by boosting the employee's morale and drive him/her to work harder. Although, maintaining high moral principles in a company is an efficacious option, it cannot be considered the best and the most effective.

Maintaining ethical strategy is a must for any company, but just by sticking with that strategy is not going the help the company in the long run. It is supposed to formulate and implement lucrative methods and long term financial plans to increase its profitability, but at the same not jeopardize its moral principles. Shareholders are not going to look at the ethical strategy of a company they are going to invest in. Instead, they would be very keen on the performance of the organisation in the stock market and would rely on the profits it has been generating. A company has to project itself as a profit making organisation to the stockholders and consumer. This can be achieved by good advertising and management skills and not just by work ethics. A company would have a bleak future if it fails to attract consumers towards it.

On the other hand, having a completely unethical approach just for the sake of money would definitely harm the organisation. There have been a lot of cases which bolster this claim. Many companies in the past have duped naive people. There is no paucity of con artists in this world. For example, in India a education consulting agency had duped a student from a rural area of Rs. 56000 claiming they would get him admitted into one of the Ivy league colleges of the United States of America. The agency people decamped to another state after receiving the cheque. Much to his chagrin, the student realized that this after there was no response for several months from the agency. After a police complaint was logded, these charlatans were tracked down and put behind the bars. This example proves that not only an unethical approach would affect the company but also the consumers ho trust it.

To recapitulate, an ethical approach is a must for a company, but is should also be in constant look out for new long term financial plans and bring them into action. To completely rely on moral principles would prove to be imprudent and might affect the company in the long run.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-07-28 vsn1541997 50 view
2018-01-24 Md17 33 view
2016-12-27 abhigna batchu 50 view
2016-09-24 cybertelic 70 view
2016-09-17 met43821 83 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user vsn1541997 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...e most effective way is by boosting the employees morale and drive him/her to work harder...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 605, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng. A company has to project itself as a profit making organisation to the stockh...
^^
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...umers towards it. On the other hand, having a completely unethical approach j...
^^
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ts in this world. For example, in India a education consulting agency had duped a...
^
Line 5, column 618, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... chagrin, the student realized that this after there was no response for several ...
^^
Line 5, column 875, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'consumers'' or 'consumer's'?
Suggestion: consumers'; consumer's
...h would affect the company but also the consumers ho trust it. To recapitulate, an eth...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 67, Rule ID: IS_SHOULD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
...l approach is a must for a company, but is should also be in constant look out for...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, as to, for example, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2052.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 429.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78321678322 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64676461655 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494172494172 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2810353517 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2727272727 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296896578258 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831300821087 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139442108914 0.0758088955206 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204338001531 0.150359130593 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150114321283 0.0667264976115 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.