In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.
Imagination and knowledge are both sine-qua-non's in any profession given their ability to create value. However, it is neccessary that we stretch our human imaginations way above the realms of knowledge to drive radical progress. The most sophisticated product to have been created from human's knowledge would probably have been delibilitating to the rapid development in our world today.
For example, the imaginations of Albert Einsteins led to the advent of the law of gravity which has helped in the development of space exploration and the aeroplane. While imaginations have created to create unique products and solutions, knowledge has only helped us build on previous knowledge. One can even argue that early men always had knowledge but it had taken us over "2000BC" to get here with the technological advancement because men started focusing on their imaginations in more recent generations. Do we compare the Philosophers such as Aristotle to Sir Isaac Newton? One thing that seems a clear differentor is the passion to study the way of life and focus on what humanly wisdom meant for the former, the later was more focused on challenging nature.
Imagination captures the adage, "thinking outside the box" more than anything else. It allows you to ask cogent questions such as: Is there a better way? Can I create something never seen before? These are the drivers of invention. Although, we must recognise that the great inventors and scientists who shaped the world also obtained some form of knowledge before doing such exploit. It must be said that this knowledge was available to all. Yet, they stood out for adding a layer called imagination to their own thinking. For instance, we churn out thousands of college graduate every year in America, if we decide to ignore the world. How many of those graduates with their newly acquired knowledge have been able to do something extraordinary? It tells us that maybe the issue is not with knowledge but a dearth of "out of the blue" thinking in many of us.
The interconnectedness of the world today has been driven by imaginary thinking. The idea that it should be possible to send images, voice notes, readable text messages to someone in the remotest part of the world. The early humans never had such imaginations, they wandered about looking for food, shelter, clothes to wear. When humans began to settle down and think of how to improve themselves i.e. dream of a better state of life, only then did we began to move away from the forms of primitive lifestyles. We need a world where people dare to dream and work backwards from such dream to make it practicable and a reality. It is said that a normal human being utilised below 3% of their brain capacity in their lifetime and that was traced to a lack of deep and critical thinking, ignoring the commonplace and committing to a habit that promotes ingenuity and questioning the norm.
It is neccessary that we all imbibe a culture of imagination to experience even tremendous growth in areas such as technology that has provided us with real proof of what imagination can do compared to knowledge. The accelerated growth in the world today holds more to imagination than knowledge, that has always existed ab-initio.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-18 | Marqueetim | 83 | view |
| 2024-01-16 | jenas | 68 | view |
| 2023-10-27 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-29 | nigarsafarova | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | rickxiangx | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 558, Rule ID: CONFUSION_OF_OUR_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'our'?
Suggestion: our
...ir own thinking. For instance, we churn out thousands of college graduate every yea...
^^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...eone in the remotest part of the world. The early humans never had such imagination...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, then, while, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2737.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 545.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02201834862 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83169070408 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91719692095 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 297.0 215.323595506 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54495412844 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 869.4 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8375761984 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.269230769 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9615384615 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.30769230769 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182435423898 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475430713516 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526075261635 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112034438153 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599247682033 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.