A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The speaker asserts that the nation should require all the students to study the same national curriculum before entering college. In my point of view, the nation is responsible for maintaining country development and training experts; So, the nation has to require students to study the same national curriculum until entering college; Requiring students to study the same curriculum has a positive effect on the country. And requiring students to learn the same curriculum is practical. Therefore, adopting such recommendations have a positive influence on the country; I totally agree with the speaker.
To begin with, the nation is responsible for requiring students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. The nation has to maintain continuous development and train enough experts. In many countries, there are many reforms in the education to ensure every student can get much education in order to develop experts to facilitate country in the future. In a word, nations have the responsibility of requiring students to study the same national curriculum before they enter college.
Further, requiring all students to study the same curriculum has a positive effect on students. Since these methods improve students’ will of learning, students will increase the probability of success. For example, in Taiwan, students are studying some curriculum until entering the university. With a fair competition, students will focus on studying, fulfilling them to facilitate occupational development in the future. In other words, these tests are increasing the students’ will to study. In sum, requiring students to study the same national class have a positive influence on students.
Finally, the things that nation require all of its students to study the same curriculum is feasible. Nation has enough resources to research and develop a series of the national curriculum. At the same time, this method can save more money, and all revision is convenient because only the relevant sector plans this curriculum. For instance, in Taiwan, because only the ministry of education manages education information, including admission requirement tests, and arranges curriculum, the admission test can hold on schedule constantly. In brief, when the government wants to reform, it is feasible to require all students to learn the same curriculum before entering the university.
To sum up, for developing the country and training experts for the country, the nation should require all students to learn the same curriculum before entering college. With a fair competition, students will take great pains on studying. Then, this method will benefit the country. And it is feasible to require students to study the same curriculum because the government has resources; Thus, I strongly agree with what the speaker says.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
| 2024-02-01 | kathleenkong | 66 | view |
- We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your positi 50
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 50
- We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your positi 66
- We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your positi 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, so, then, therefore, thus, as to, for example, for instance, in brief, in other words, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2415.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 439.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50113895216 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88624591313 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.394077448747 0.4932671777 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 761.4 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 14.0 4.38483146067 319% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.7062695574 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0869565217 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21739130435 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414852062754 0.243740707755 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1670130523 0.0831039109588 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125525056602 0.0758088955206 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295708028793 0.150359130593 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704986460799 0.0667264976115 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.