A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Having a same curriculum for all the student's is like eating same dish every day upto the age of adulthood. The prompt recommends, a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. In my opinion the statement is loosely incorrect. Student should be given freedom to choose what they want, if they can. At first, for someone who is managing policies related to education at an administrative level, may seem like a good option to do. As this option requires less effort in managing different aspects of education before the college. For instance, if you are education minister, deciding how to manage issue's like the budget, syllabus, teachers, quality, wide availibilty of education then, it is very much a good choice to keep things as simple as possible. A diverse curriculum means diverse rules and regulation associated with each of the individual curriculum. Hence, it may good and easy way out. On the other hand, it should not be ignored that every student is different and has different requirements, and hence, there is a requirement for specilization. For instance, there are cases in which a student is not doing well in one subject but is at a master level in other. Take, Albert Einstein for example. It is said that he was a weak student in the field of social science but was at the top in the field of physics. This example, tells us that there are variations in the students and hence, teaching all the student's same thing is not fair at all. Furthermore, it is also the case that students like on the both side of the curve. If some students are strong then it is very much possible that some may be weak and are struggling just to understand the concepts. Take education policy of germany, it has three sections, one for the weakest, one for the average and the other for the strongest. Hence, every student is getting what he or she is comfortable with. Previous example tells us that different student's have different needs and should be treated as such. In conclusion, it is difficult to take sides in this case. But for majority of cases the better choice is not to implement a constant curriculum throughout the nation. As there are many down sides to it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
- The following is a memo from the marketing director of Lamfonz Pet Stores which operates thirty pet stores worldwide Five years ago our competitor Fish Emporium started advertising in Exotic Pets Monthly magazine Their sales overall have seen a steady inc 72
- Fifteen years ago Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors Since that time Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes and overall student 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement No books should ever be banned 70
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news During the same time period most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with th 55
- Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 2203, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...stant curriculum throughout the nation. As there are many down sides to it.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1848.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71428571429 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65674293207 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497448979592 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4963551298 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22727272727 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.97078651685 20% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313500594052 0.243740707755 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910695658602 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16468772007 0.0758088955206 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313500594052 0.150359130593 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.