A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
The statement "A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college" is a recommendation I support because of the following reasons.
Education before college is what I consider basic education which every student is expected to have irrespective of whether the student is going to enroll in college or not. If every student studies the same curriculum it is will be advantageous because should the student enroll in college or not the student will have basic education to help through life, it also helps the nation to know the strength and weakness of each student. This recommendation gives the nation the ability to organize a national exam that puts all students on a level playing field as they would be tested on the same national curriculum.
By adopting this recommendation, the nation can tailor each student to different majors in college from knowing their strength and weakness that was discovered from studying the same national curriculum and in the long reducing the student mismatch to majors studied in the college. This will also go a long run to reduce the time students spent in college as a result of student mismatch to colleges.
Finally, adopting this recommendation guarantees the nation of having a standardized quality assurance model in the way the students are being taught and what they are also taught as there would be a reduction in the number of incidences where students are not taught certain topics because of disparity in the curriculum. Also with this recommendation, it gives the nation the ability to have a unified school calendar across the nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 324, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...because of disparity in the curriculum. Also with this recommendation, it gives the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 2235.4752809 62% => OK
No of words: 273.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10256410256 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86130062838 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 215.323595506 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468864468864 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.2370786517 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 23.0359550562 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.6040898249 60.3974514979 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.125 118.986275619 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.125 23.4991977007 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.540262661623 0.243740707755 222% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.264081294606 0.0831039109588 318% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.177732655287 0.0758088955206 234% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.379319816149 0.150359130593 252% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.183062475914 0.0667264976115 274% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 14.1392134831 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 48.8420337079 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 12.1743820225 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 100.480337079 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.2143820225 139% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.7820224719 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.