“A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum
until they enter college.”
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Currently worldwide, the curriculum that pupils studying are a combination of various subjects, including language, mathematics, science, social studies, etc. Such course design has a fundamental goal: to ensure rudimental knowledge is deeply rooted to a youth. Afterall, it is not easy for a youngster to excavate the subject he/she is intersted in; by engaging micellaneous aspects of "cognitive stimulus", and incresing course difficulty through years of study, he/she will surely be able to find his/her strength and weakness, and therefore choose a future career that actually fits his/her talent. In addition, it costs much less for a nation to execute. By requiring students to study the same curriculum seems to be a terrific strategy.
However, every human is different, therefore it is not suitable to apply the same measurement to everyone. Known as the "King of Invention", Thomas Edison is one of the most well-known examples to contradict such arguement. He only received public education for three months, who later being dispelled directly from his principal. However, by treasuring his innate interest, he then found what he is good at: creativity. Throughout his life, he learned all by himself, and invented over 2000 items including typewriter, which brightens humanity. In retrospect, if he stayed in school in loath, tenchnology improvements may be delayed.
Last but not least, many careers have to be fostered since a very young age. Many soccer players like Lionel Messi started play since nine years old, and even moved to Spain to train systematically; Gymnastic players have relative short careers, hence it is crucial to practice since a very young age. Also, for those who has already made their mind, it is inappropriate to restrict what curriculum they should study. Strict execution for the same courses on everyone may encumber diversity and social values.
To conclude, I do not agree that a nation should require all students to study the same nation curriculum. Although it has its benefits and may be easier to apply for mass youth, we should consider the outliers that actually also pushes the era forward, and respect the education they really needed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-18 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious 75
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 79
- Passage In many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages First of all a group of people has a wider range of knowled
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 62
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat pupils studying are a combination of various subjects, including language, ma...
^^
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: After all
... knowledge is deeply rooted to a youth. Afterall, it is not easy for a youngster to exca...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, hence, however, if, may, really, so, then, therefore, well, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1870.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 351.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32763532764 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95009533323 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641025641026 0.4932671777 130% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.7108177115 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6470588235 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41176470588 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173163231687 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618590370841 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924431721121 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116490899237 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0878983221912 0.0667264976115 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.