A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The prompt suggests that a nation should require its students to study the same curriculum until they enter college. While this is an issue that can be argued for or against, I mostly agree with this suggestion for the following reasons.
On the one hand, requiring all of a nation’s students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college could have several benefits. By standardizing education, the government can ensure that all students receive the same foundational knowledge and skills, regardless of their background or socio-economic status. It also enables universities to rely on a consistent level of knowledge from incoming students, which may improve the quality of higher education. Additionally, a unified national curriculum could promote a sense of national identity and help preserve cultural values and traditions.
On the other hand, this policy might have some negative implications as well. By imposing a prescribed curriculum, students’ autonomy and creativity could be stifled. Not all students learn in the same way, and some might struggle to keep up with the set standard. Moreover, national curricula tend to be scripted and may not accommodate cultural and regional differences, leaving certain groups of students at a disadvantage. Furthermore, the implementation of a national curriculum can diminish the role of local decision-makers and educators in shaping what gets taught in their classrooms.
In conclusion, the requirement that all students should study the same national curriculum until they enter college has both advantages and disadvantages. While it ensures consistency in knowledge and skills, it may also infringe on student autonomy and fail to accommodate regional and cultural differences. In my opinion, the most effective education systems are able to balance standardization with flexibility and autonomy. In this way, students receive the fundamental education they need while still having the freedom to explore their individual academic pursuits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-04 | Siddhant412 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | SamikshaVarpe | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | TiOluwani97 | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | TiOluwani97 | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to 58
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to 58
- Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 50
- Hospital statistics regarding people who go to the emergency room after roller skating accidents indicate the need for more protective equipment Within that group of people 75 percent of those who had accidents in streets or parking lots had not been wear 55
- Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, still, well, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.5258426966 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 305.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65901639344 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18288556945 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560655737705 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7002903586 60.3974514979 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.066666667 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.21951772744 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278396648807 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106017011691 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121906852128 0.0758088955206 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186796117239 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454628044922 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 48.8420337079 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 12.1743820225 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.1639044944 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.