“A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.”
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The author here claims that every student of the country until senior secondary should have the same curriculum. I partially agree to this claim of a common curriculum.
Any nation's progress is determined by how well equipped the youth of the nation are. Having a common curriculum for the entire nation seems like a good idea at first. This is because having a common curriculum will have every student at par with their peers. Furthermore, the opputunity that every student will get will be irrespective of their background. For example, considering a diverse country like India where the population is so distributed, having a common curriculum may be a boon for a lot of students from remote areas who do not have that easy access to resources. This will allow the students from remote and educationally weak background students to have a chance to be at par with students from cities. Additionally, there will not be any discussions on regional issues but rather national issues can be included in the curriculum for larger inclusivity.
However, the common curriculum will rather end up in creating a lot of issues rather than solving them. Firstly, similar to the previous example, considering a country like India, there will be huge debates on whether to include regional issues and history onto the curriculum, and if yes, which regional history should be given priority as not all regional history can be included. Bigger and economically forward states will have a say in this and may sideline the smaller states in this matter. This may lead to more disharmony in the country. Secondly, for students to be competent, they will need to be informed about the place where they come from. If regional history is omitted from the national curriculum, the students may not understand the larger picture. For students to get a clear picture of any issue, it has to start from the grassroots level.
In conclusion, I am not saying not to have a national curriculum, but rather have a nation wide common curriculum for the competencies that are needed for the future of the youth and a region specific curriculum for subjects like history. This way all students are at par and are ready with the skillsets required for the future as well as have sense of belonging to this nation and understand their background and history.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-01 | kathleenkong | 66 | view |
| 2024-01-03 | trainyperson | 70 | view |
| 2023-12-18 | gretakernnnne | 66 | view |
| 2023-11-21 | Mithil | 50 | view |
| 2023-11-01 | qwertyy | 50 | view |
- Because of the progress in medicine people are living longer now Do you think the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 73
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- Some people think that too much money has been spent looking after and repairing old buildings so we should knock down old buildings and build modern ones instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- Because of the progress in medicine people are living longer now Do you think the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he country until senior secondary should have the same curriculum. I partially ag...
^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: NATION_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nationwide'?
Suggestion: nationwide
... national curriculum, but rather have a nation wide common curriculum for the competencies ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1944.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 394.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93401015228 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74940465424 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446700507614 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 623.7 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5988866742 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94444444444 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197649773803 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762826668228 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445393165073 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145357431623 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290097433755 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.