A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
A nation will only strive if it can look back on the investment directed towards education and development since the leaders of tomorrow are the today students. I do mostly agree with the assertion that pupils need to have a structured curriculum of coursework in two reasons. I, however, do concede that education should be homogenous in nature.
Firstly, having a regimented form of education will serve as a mean of adequately supervising the progress made by students. This nature of educating children tends to influence the manner in which students will be assessed. For instance, in the West African countries like Ghana and Nigeria, a common examination council was set up to provide a standardized examination to all students at a certain level. Devoid of such a platform will rend these countries effort in examining students futile. Consequently, the results of students are collated and informs various stakeholders on the progress being made by schools and government at large.
Again, adopting a commonly used academic format nationwide will ensure a common ground for students to compete amongst themselves. Competition to an extent prepares students to be prepared. In a global village where everything is fast paced, it is only normal to instill a sense of challenge and competition among students. In the same vein, it is necessary to adopt the same subjects in order to be able to award and recognize hardworking students. A typical example is the 2022 spelling bee competition.
Nonetheless, in doing these, it is worthy to note that engaging students with a structured educational module will curb the sense of promoting soft skills like teamwork. Diversity in education is a beautiful thing, and so, why wait to promote diversity in educational curriculum during the college days of students. Extant literature has it that, at the development stages of a child, the mind is ready to learn and explore. And so, having an academic structure that allows diversity and interdisciplinary module will expose students to many choices. Afterall, a life is not life without choices.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-18 | Marqueetim | 66 | view |
| 2024-02-04 | sailesh_189 | 50 | view |
| 2024-02-04 | sailesh_189 | 50 | view |
| 2024-02-04 | sailesh_189 | 66 | view |
| 2024-02-04 | sailesh_189 | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
A nation will only strive if it can look...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ation should be homogenous in nature. Firstly, having a regimented form of edu...
^^^^
Line 2, column 454, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...void of such a platform will rend these countries effort in examining students futile. Co...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 648, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ade by schools and government at large. Again, adopting a commonly used academic...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 510, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e is the 2022 spelling bee competition. Nonetheless, in doing these, it is worth...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 554, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: After all
...e will expose students to many choices. Afterall, a life is not life without choices. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l, a life is not life without choices.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, look, nonetheless, so, still, for instance, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 339.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19764011799 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01849342338 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581120943953 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.647704482 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8888888889 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121108617306 0.243740707755 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0330915725307 0.0831039109588 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0234629316721 0.0758088955206 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0685473251509 0.150359130593 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0118266237108 0.0667264976115 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.