A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college
A nation's development relies on new ideas and inventions. Ones that change the way we think and live. This would not be possible without such a diverse society that challenge and pushes one another. A standard national curriculum for a nation would be harmful to the development of individuality and hinder the diversity of its students.
There are virtuality endless disciplines ranging from the fine arts to science and only a limited time to learn them. Typically, schools must choose which subjects to focus on. The natural variability of these schools would compensate for the inability for individual schools to cover all subjects. But if a nation were to require all schools to teach the same curriculum, certain disciplines would have to be left out. How would we be able to objectively judge which area of study is superior to another? What criteria would we base it on?
A curriculum that teaches and tests its students on a narrow range of subjects is certain to exclude individuals. People are proficient in similar tasks or subjects. A student that is excellent in Mathematics could struggle in English. Another student may be a musical genius but be totally lost in history. A standardized curriculum would not be able to accommodate this natural variability among students--- It would favor one group over the next.
The extent of this effect would ultimately be felt once students enter society or higher education like college. Schools would only produce cookie cutter minds and thus a very limited skill set. Having interdisciplinary skills and solutions is what allows innovation and new approaches to the problems we as a nation face. Innovations that create life-saving technologies like the defibrillator, which combines physiology with engineering. Or green energy solutions like the solar panels, which would not be here without an understanding of material science and electrical science.
It is very evident that without a diverse mindset many technologies and innovations today would not be here. A nation that enforces a standard national curriculum would select out individuals and ultimately hinder the diversity of its students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-18 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 58
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the complaint 54
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 58
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend."Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom 58
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 3, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
A nations development relies on new ideas and inv...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'thus']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.237967914439 0.240241500013 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.147058823529 0.157235817809 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.101604278075 0.0880659088768 115% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0427807486631 0.0497285424764 86% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0294117647059 0.0444667217837 66% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0935828877005 0.12292977631 76% => OK
Participles: 0.0160427807487 0.0406280797675 39% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.98914359832 2.79330140395 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0347593582888 0.030933414821 112% => OK
Particles: 0.00267379679144 0.0016655270985 161% => OK
Determiners: 0.104278074866 0.0997080785238 105% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0427807486631 0.0249443105267 172% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0320855614973 0.0148568991511 216% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2171.0 2732.02544248 79% => OK
No of words: 346.0 452.878318584 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.27456647399 6.0361032391 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.58838876751 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.390173410405 0.366273622748 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.320809248555 0.280924506359 114% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.21387283237 0.200843997647 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.150289017341 0.132149295362 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98914359832 2.79330140395 107% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 219.290929204 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549132947977 0.48968727796 112% => OK
Word variations: 59.8993773881 55.4138127331 108% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.7272727273 23.380412469 67% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2675107684 59.4972553346 56% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6818181818 141.124799967 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7272727273 23.380412469 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.227272727273 0.674092028746 34% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 47.8081975828 51.4728631049 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.58536585366 1.64882698954 96% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281640618516 0.391690518653 72% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.103077548105 0.123202303941 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0642864153996 0.077325440228 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.470943030931 0.547984918172 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.11612609073 0.149214159877 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887258044467 0.161403998019 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992542484704 0.0892212321368 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.258224904608 0.385218514788 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.047780956202 0.0692045440612 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169998676244 0.275328986314 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043361780484 0.0653680567796 66% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88274336283 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.70907079646 221% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.5995575221 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.