A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college
A rigid nation-wide curriculum should not be enforced upon school students. On the contrary, school students should be allowed to choose their area of specialization and spend some time exploring it in depth before they enter college.
Today's school curriculi are designed to teach students all of a plethora of different disciplines before they step into college. As the famous saying goes, a typical high schooler is often the jack of all trades and the master of none. By the time most children reach the age of 16 years, they have a broad idea of what fields they prefer and what they abhor. For instance, many students study History and Political Sciences with disdain - they would instead prefer performing interesting experiments in the Chemistry Lab. Others might want to be immersed all day in Literature, and stay as far away from Mathematics as possible. However, since the school curriculum forces the child to study to study all subjects, all these endeavours are seldom possible.
Going further, colleges also have a tough time setting their entrance tests. For example, an institution that specializes in Physics would have to set problems testing the student's aptitude in Biology and English, just because focussing on just one subject would disadvantage the broad spectrum of students taking the test. Hence, letting school students specialize before joining college would ease the testing procedure for colleges, and also help them select more motivated and knowledgeable students.
However, the school student should not be let to decide his or her specialization at a nascent stage. For instance, a first grade student who has just watched Interstellar would readily opt for becoming an Astronomer, without knowing anything about the area. Simliarly, we should excercise caution while letting students decide their course of study lest there would form multiple separated study groups in school, who do not interact socially with one another.
Therefore, if we want our young, fresh minds at school to become productive and transform into better citizens who contribute timely to the society, we should encourage variability in the curriculi of school students across the nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-18 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 23
- “Over the past year, our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station’s coverage of l 63
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 83
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 63
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating, and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes litt 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 685, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'to study'.
Suggestion: to study
... the school curriculum forces the child to study to study all subjects, all these endeavours are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... would have to set problems testing the students aptitude in Biology and English, just b...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1862.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 349.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33524355301 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69373271101 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604584527221 0.4932671777 123% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0474289264 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.133333333 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2666666667 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261894036939 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870537474943 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486167324525 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139629399471 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584759687043 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.