A Nation Should Require All Of Its Students To Study The Same National Curriculum

Essay topics:

A Nation Should Require All Of Its Students To Study The Same National Curriculum

The education system is one of the strongest pillars of any society that develops and manifests technological, economical, cultural blossoming. In this endeavor mandating uniform curriculum to all the students until they enter college seems to benefit any nation at large by providing holistic developmental curriculum that takes all the fields into consideration, and by providing unifrom curriculum they are promoting national integraiton in multicultural societies or multi linguisitc nations.

Primarily, providing uniform curriculum to all the pupils eases the burden on the board of education for setting up different curriculum. Providing same set of educational subjects provided that it emcompasses holisitic development would present the same set of environemnt for the students to choose their field of study. Since college is when the pupils chooses thier subjects of interest, they would be subject to all the fields to get a preview or the introduction so that they have holistic view of the availbale fields and how they are intricately connected. This negates being parchially inclined in choosing a subject.

Secondly, different boards of examinations such as one present in India as CBSE, ICSE, and state boards do have uniform curriculum in each of them, just that each of them would go deeper into the subejcts presented. THis neccessitates to cater to the more inquisitve students.

However, mandating all the students would, in a way, be promoting herd thinking. If all the younger generations are taught the same subjects, thinking beyond what is presented, which is the necessasry tool to all innovation, would be dampened. One might also argue that a child prodigy who knows what field the he/ she is interested in, might fail in this education system and would feel stuck until they have to ficish all the mandatory courses. These special cases of students might be hampered from finishing their education earlier than others.

In the light of the above argument, mandating all the students would, by and large hampers the development of gifted children. However, the education system must also have provision to bypass the necessary "mandatory courses", if the sutdents are promising in their field and are definite in what they want to do. Hence, a uniform curriculum would be benefitting the nation in national integration, reduce the burden on educational board, and dampen the parochial mindset. And the education system should be designed in the light of the argument that some might want to by pass the system.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-18 ekarumeblessing@icloud.com 66 view
2024-11-09 KLH 66 view
2024-09-28 ascetichedonist 83 view
2024-08-30 Rishab@1999 66 view
2024-08-27 Rishab@1999 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Vikas94 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...necessasry tool to all innovation, would be dampened. One might also argue that a...
^^
Line 7, column 309, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'he'?
Suggestion: the; he
...at a child prodigy who knows what field the he/ she is interested in, might fail in th...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 254, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...andatory courses', if the sutdents are promising in their field and are definite in what...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, such as, by and large

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2166.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 404.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36138613861 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96126100811 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507425742574 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.3066116877 60.3974514979 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.375 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3125 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217103403944 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717424520335 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749411967206 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123158126135 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656349027149 0.0667264976115 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.8971910112 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.